Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05660304
NCT05660304
Recruiting
N/A

Modulating Language Networks in Patients With Post-stroke Aphasia Using Cortico-cortical Paired Associative Stimulation

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab1 site in 1 country10 target enrollmentJanuary 9, 2023
ConditionsStrokeAphasia

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Stroke
Sponsor
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Enrollment
10
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Changes in functional connectivity with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
3 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The overall goal of this study is to evaluate whether stimulation of two brain areas alongside behavioral speech-language therapy increases connectivity to improve language functions in stroke-aphasia patients.

Detailed Description

The brain is made up of networks that communicate with each other to help us think and communicate. After a stroke, networks between different areas of the brain can lose connection. In the case of aphasia, networks in the language areas of the brain are often disrupted. There is currently no "fix" to restore these specific language connections. However, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) might help the areas reconnect through alternative pathways. TMS is a non-invasive procedure (in other words, it takes place outside your body). A coil will be placed over your head. The coil sends magnetic pulses to your brain to stimulate, or excite, neurons. Most studies using TMS stimulate one area of the brain at a time, but this does not tell us how to improve the network connections between brain areas. For this study, we plan to stimulate two language areas of the brain to improve these network connections. To do this, we will use a form of TMS called "cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation" (ccPAS). This type of TMS involves applying paired pulses to two different brain areas that have been "disconnected" from each other after a stroke. The pulses are delivered with a time difference, on other words, one pulse after another. If you choose to participate, you will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. There is a 50% chance you will receive active brain stimulation with speech-language therapy and a 50% chance that you will receive inactive or sham stimulation (no brain stimulation) along with speech-language therapy. Neither you nor the clinician on the research project will choose - or know - which group you are assigned to. Only the person administering the stimulation will know.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
January 9, 2023
End Date
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
3 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Julio C Hernandez Pavon

Research Scientist

Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of non-fluent aphasia due to a single, left-hemisphere stroke
  • ≧ six months post-stroke onset
  • WAB-R Fluency, Grammatical Competence, and Paraphasias Score between 2-6
  • 18+ years of age
  • Premorbidly right-handed
  • English-speaking
  • Ability to participate in fMRI / TMS protocol

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cardiac pacemaker or pacemaker wires; neurostimulators; implanted pumps
  • Metal in the body (rods, plates, screws, shrapnel, dentures, IUD) or metallic particles in the eye
  • Surgical clips in the head or previous neurosurgery
  • Any magnetic particles in the body
  • Cochlear implants
  • Prosthetic heart valves
  • Epilepsy or any other type of seizure history
  • History of significant head trauma (i.e., extended loss of consciousness, neurological sequelae)
  • Significant other disease (heart disease, malignant tumors, mental disorders)
  • Significant claustrophobia

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Changes in functional connectivity with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI)

Time Frame: Before vs. after ccPAS/sham ccPAS, on Days 1, 5, and 10 of the ccPAS/sham ccPAS regimen. We also compare the responses from Day 1 vs. Day 10.

A seed-based functional connectivity analysis will be carried out between the two stimulated brain areas. To assess the changes in effective connectivity, we will compare the seed-based connectivity values across sessions.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Changes in oral reading probes(Visit 3 (baseline, pre-intervention), Visit 7 (midpoint, of intervention), Visit 12 (immediately post-intervention), and Visit 13 (maintenance, 1-month post-intervention).)
  • Changes in the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) Reading subtest(Visit 1 (baseline, pre-intervention), Visit 12 (immediately post-intervention), and Visit 13 (maintenance, 1-month post-intervention).)
  • Changes on The Short-Form Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT)(Visit 3 (baseline, pre-intervention), Visit 12 (immediately post-intervention), and Visit 13 (maintenance, 1-month post-intervention).)
  • Changes in production of connected speech using standardized expositional discourse stimuli (Broken Window and Cat in Tree picture scenes)(Visit 3 (baseline, pre-intervention), Visit 12 (immediately post-intervention), and Visit 13 (maintenance, 1-month post-intervention).)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials