Long-term Safety of Rivastigmine Capsule and Patch in Patients With Mild to Moderately-severe Dementia Associated With Parkinson's Disease (PDD)
- Conditions
- Parkinson's Disease Dementia
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00623103
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to provide long-term safety data for rivastigmine capsule and transdermal patch treatments, in particular the effect of rivastigmine on worsening of the underlying motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease (PD), in patients with mild to moderately severe dementia associated with PD.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 583
- Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease, according to the UK Parkinson's disease Society Brain Bank criteria
- Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease dementia according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria, with onset of symptoms of dementia at least 2 years following the first diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease
- Mini Mental State Examination score of ≥10 and ≤ 26 (at Screening Visit only)
- An advanced, severe, or unstable disease of any type that may interfere with the primary and secondary variable evaluations
- A score of 5 (wheelchair bound or bedridden) in the "on"-state on the Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging (UPDRS Part V)
- A current diagnosis of any primary neurodegenerative disorder other than idiopathic PD
- A current diagnosis of any treatable dementia (hypothyroidism, syphilis, vitamin B12 or folate deficiency) that is verified by the investigator to be the cause of dementia.
- A current diagnosis of probably vascular dementia according to the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and the Association International pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (NINDS-AIREN) criteria
- A current diagnosis of a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV criteria
- A history of stereotaxic brain surgery for Parkinson's disease
- A known exaggerated pharmacological sensitivity or hypersensitivity to drugs similar to rivastigmine or to other cholinergic compounds
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rivastigmine patch Rivastigmine transdermal patch Rivastigmine patch once a day in the morning, worn for 24 hours, starting at 5 cm\^2 (delivering 4.6 mg rivastigmine over a 24 hour period) for 4 weeks then titrated up to 10 cm\^2 daily (delivering 9.5 mg rivastigmine over a 24 hour period). The 10 cm\^2 patch or the highest well tolerated dose was maintained until week 76. Rivastigmine capsule Rivastigmine capsule Rivastigmine capsules starting at a total dose of 3 mg/day (1.5 mg twice daily orally) titrated up in 3 mg/day increments every 4 weeks to a final dose of 12 mg/day (6 mg twice daily orally). The 12 mg/day dose or the highest dose tolerated was maintained until week 76.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of Parkinson Disease (PD) Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall) 76 Weeks The AEs were summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any of the 4 AEs or discontinued due to any of the 4 predefined AEs (tremor, muscle rigidity, bradykinesia, and fall)in each treatment group. The 95% CIs associated with the rates were also presented.
Percentage of Participants With Study Drug Discontinuations Due to Predefined AEs That Are Due, or Potentially Due, to Worsening of PD Motor Symptoms (Tremor, Muscle Rigidity, Bradykinesia, Fall) 76 Weeks The discontinuations due to these AEs were summarized by presenting the number and percentage of patients having any of the 4 AEs or discontinued due to any of the 4 predefined AEs (tremor, muscle rigidity, bradykinesia, and fall) in each treatment group. The 95% CIs associated with these rates were also presented.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Motor Examination Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline From Baseline to Weeks 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a 6 part Parkinson's disease specific rating scale that estimates clinical function taking into consideration both disability (functional deficits) and impairment (objective clinical signs). Part III records the motor examination in Items 18-31 rated on a scale of 0 to 4 with (0 being absent/ normal and 4 being the worse) for a total possible score of 0 to 56.
Change in Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (Mattis DRS-2) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Compared to Baseline From Baseline to Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 Mattis DRS-2 is a measure of cognitive status. The total score is the sum of 5 subscale scores: Attention \[0-37\], Initiation/Perservation \[0-37\] (performing alternating movements), Construction \[0-6\] (copying designs), Conceptualization \[0-39\] (similarities) and Memory \[0-25\] (sentence recall, design recognition)for a total possible score of 0-144. Higher score is reflective of better cognitive function, lower scores associated with more pronounced cognitive deficit. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive number indicates an improvement.
Change in Ten Point Clock Test (TPCT) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline From Baseline to Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 The Ten Point Clock Test measures executive functioning and visuospatial skills. Participants are asked to put numbers on the face of a clock and then make the clock read 10 minutes after 11. Points are awarded on a scale of 0 to 10 for spacing of specific numbers and the positions of the hands. The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive number indicates improvement.
Change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory-10 (NPI-10) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline At Week 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation) The parameter for analysis was the change from baseline of total score of 10 items on the NPI scale (NPI-10). The total score is a sum of the 10 domains, where the score for a domain is defined as the product of frequency (range: 1-4) and severity (range: 1-3). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score(thus the range for the total score is 0 to 120 with 0 being completely healthy to 120 which is the worse score patient can get). The change from baseline was calculated such that a negative number indicates an improvement (symptom reduction).
Change in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities Of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scores at Weeks 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) Compared to Baseline From Baseline to Week 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation) The 23 item caregiver-based ADL scale of the dementia Alzheimer's disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) was used for analysis. This is a caregiver rated questionnaire of 23 items, with possible scores over a range of 0-78, where 78 denote full functioning with no impairment. The total score was derived by adding up the item scores of the 23 items.
The change from baseline was calculated such that a positive change indicates an improvement.UPDRS Part V Stage (Modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging)at Baseline, Week 8,16,24,52 and 76 (or Early Discontinuation) From Baseline to Week 8, 16, 24, 52 and 76 (or early discontinuation) Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) is a 6 part Parkinson's disease specific rating scale that estimates clinical function taking into consideration both disability (functional deficits) and impairment (objective clinical signs). UPDRS Part V is assessed by the modified Hoehn and Yahr Staging Scale. The scale ranges from 0 (no signs of disease) to 5 (wheelchair bound or bedridden unless aided).
Trial Locations
- Locations (19)
Collier Neurologic Specialists
🇺🇸Naples, Florida, United States
Neurological Associates
🇺🇸Meridian, Idaho, United States
Progressive Clinical Research
🇺🇸Bountiful, Utah, United States
Sunrise Clinical Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Hollywood, Florida, United States
Evanstan Northwestern Healthcare Medical Group
🇺🇸Glenview, Illinois, United States
Neurological Care of Central NY
🇺🇸Syracuse, New York, United States
Neurology & Neuroscience Associates, Inc.
🇺🇸Akron, Ohio, United States
Neurosearch, Inc.
🇺🇸Reseda, California, United States
Research Protocol Management Solutions
🇺🇸Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Neurology Specialists of Dallas
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States
Neurosearch II, Inc.
🇺🇸Ventura, California, United States
Novartis Investigative site
🇮🇹Cassino, Italy
Comprehensive Neurology Specialists, PC
🇺🇸Suwanee, Georgia, United States
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
Novartis Investigative Site
🇬🇧Vale of Glamorgan, United Kingdom
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
21st Century Neurology
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Square 1 Clinical Research
🇺🇸Erie, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States