Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Techmique
- Conditions
- Gynecologic Disease Requiring Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Under Neuraxial Anesthesia
- Interventions
- Procedure: Conventional Epidural TechniqueProcedure: Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle
- Registration Number
- NCT05032677
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
This study will be conducted on 50 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients will be divided into two equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=25) and group B for 25G dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=25). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 50
- ASA I and II
- Height(150-170 cm)
- patient refusal
- hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs
- bleeding disorders and coagulopathy(platelets count less than 80000,INR less than 1.5 or therapeutic dose of anticoagulant).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Dural Puncture Epidural technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle Conventional Epidural Technique - Conventional Epidural Technique Dural Puncture Epidural Technique using pencil-point 25G Whitacre needle -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method incidence of bilateral sacral blockade Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection Sensory blockade was evaluated using a non-traumatic pinprick stimulus starting at the S2 dermatome and moving in a caudad direction (measured every 2 minutes)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU, and Pain Management
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt