MedPath

D2 vs D3 Lymph Node Dissection for Left Colon Cancer

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Colon Cancer
Registration Number
NCT04364373
Lead Sponsor
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Brief Summary

The efficiency of the D3 lymph node dissection is still controversial for left colon cancer patients. This study will try find difference in 5-year overall survival between D2 and D3 lymph node dissection. Investigation of the functional and short-term outcomes will clarify safety of the D3 lymph node dissection.

Detailed Description

Discussion about optimal type of lymph node dissection in colorectal cancer continues during last 15 years, when in Europe was presented concept of complete mesocolic excision. However, this concepts is very close to Japanese D3 lymph node dissection and in the first view it seems the same but principal differences were found. Japanese concept is partial resection of the bowel according feeding artery (short bowel specimen, long lymphovascular pedicle), opposite European concept is wide resection of the bowel like hemicolectomy or extended hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy. In complete mesocolic excision anatomical landmarks are still unclear but in Japanese guidelines it has anatomical margins which can standardize this procedure. Also nerve sparing technique around root of inferior mesenteric artery was described. One more difference is in histological examination of the specimen. European concept is to pay more attention to the quality of complete mesocolic excision and less - to the number of investigated lymph nodes. In Japan lymph node extraction is performed by surgical team from the fresh specimen and send to pathologist separately (each group of lymph nodes). Considering the absence of randomized control trials for patients with left colon cancer DILEMMA trial was started using Japanese approach

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1381
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Agreement of the patient to participate in trial
  2. Colon cancer (only adenocarcinoma )
  3. The tumor located between the splenic flexure and rectosigmoid junction
  4. cT3-Т4а,b
  5. cN0-2
  6. cM0
  7. Tolerance of chemotherapy
  8. ASA 1-3
Exclusion Criteria
  1. сТis - Т2, сТ4b (tail of the pancreas, stomach, small bowel, ureter, urinary bladder)
  2. Preoperative complications of the tumor (perforation and full bowel 3. obstruction)
  3. Previous radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  4. Synchronous or metachronous tumors
  5. Women during Pregnancy or breast feeding period

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
5-year overall survivalUp to 5 years post-operatively

Probability to be alive measured in %, where 100% means that patients have a 100% probability to be alive and 0% means that patients have 0% probability to be alive

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Apical lymph node involvement rate1 month after surgery

The rate of lymph nodes 253 with metastatic cells among all lymph nodes 253, measured in %

Mortality0-30 days after surgery

The rate of death from all causes

Late postoperative complications rate30-180 days after surgery

The rate of surgical and infectious complications

Early postoperative complications rate1-30 days after surgery

The rate of surgical and infectious complications

Intraoperative complications rateDay 0

The rate of any complications within the course of surgery

Postoperative sexual dysfunctionUp to 1 year post-operatively

The rate of ejaculation problems in sexually active men and the rate of decreased vaginal lubricant production in sexually active women, measured in % from the total number of male/female patients

5-year disease free survivalUp to 5 years post-operatively

Probability to be alive with no signs of local or distant recurrence measured in %, where 100% means that patients have a 100% probability to be alive with no signs of local or distant recurrence and 0% means that patients have 0% probability to be alive with no signs of local or distant recurrence

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Clinic of coloproctology and minimally invasive surgery

🇷🇺

Moscow, Russian Federation

Clinic of coloproctology and minimally invasive surgery
🇷🇺Moscow, Russian Federation
Vladimir Balaban, Ph.D
Contact
+79889478358
balaban@kkmx.ru
Inna Tulina, Ph.D
Contact
+79264086672
tulina@kkmx.ru
Mihail Mutyk
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.