The impact of mental health training on the confidence of university staff in supporting student mental health: a quasi-experimental trial
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Confidence in supporting student mental healthStigmatising attitudes towards mental healthMental health knowledgeBehavioural responsiveness towards student mental healthPsychological distressMental Health - AnxietyMental Health - DepressionMental Health - Other mental health disorders
- Registration Number
- ACTRN12624001156572
- Lead Sponsor
- Black Dog Institute
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
Inclusion Criteria
18 years or older- Working within the participating faculty at the participating university- Frequent contact with students
Exclusion Criteria
Involved in any other mental health training programs ongoing at the Black Dog Institute (manager mental health training program for university staff or general staff mental health training program)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Confidence in supporting student mental health[Confidence in supporting student mental health is measured using a 6-item scale, presenting 6 mental health-based scenarios in which participants indicate their confidence for each scenario from 1 (Not at all confident) to 5 (Extremely confident), resulting in an overall confidence score ranging from 6 to 30. This scale has been adapted from previous randomised controlled trials in manager mental health training research (Gayed et al., 2019)<br><br>Gayed, A., Bryan, B. T., LaMontagne, A. D., Milner, A., Deady, M., Calvo, R. A., Mackinnon, A., Christensen, H., Mykletun, A., & Glozier, N. (2019). A cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate HeadCoach: an online mental health training program for workplace managers. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 61(7), 545-551. Baseline, 1-month post-intervention and 3-month follow-up (primary timepoint)]
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method