MedPath

ESG with Fundal Mucosal Ablation

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Obesity and Obesity-related Medical Conditions
Registration Number
NCT06790329
Lead Sponsor
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Brief Summary

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) have emerged as an effective primary endoscopic therapy for weight loss. While ESG recapitulates the configuration of a gastric sleeve, it has not yet been shown to achieve as robust weight loss outcomes compared to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A major difference between ESG and LSG is that the former does not involve the gastric fundus and therefore does not lead to decrease in fasting plasma ghrelin after procedure.

Recently, a new endoscopic technique involving the ablation of the gastric fundus has been developed, showing promising results with a reduction in fasting plasma ghrelin levels and a mean total body weight loss of 7.7%. Combining endoscopic gastric fundus mucosal ablation with ESG could potentially enhance the weight loss effects of ESG while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and physiological effects of combining endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with fundal mucosal ablation (ESG-FUMA) in obese patients eligible for endoscopic bariatric therapies.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • BMI equal or more than 30kg/m2 (27.5kg/m2 for Chinese or South Asian) to 40kg/m2, or BMI equal or more than 40kg/m2 and patient is either high risk for surgery or unwilling to undergo surgery, AND
  • failed standard obesity therapy of diet, exercise, behavior modification, and pharmacologic agents either alone or in combination
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous upper GI surgery (e.g. bariatric surgery, anti-reflux surgery; gastrectomy; esophageal surgery)
  • Previous ESG
  • Gastroparesis
  • Active smoking
  • An ongoing or a history of treatment with opioids in the last 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Previous pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty
  • Gastrointestinal obstruction
  • Use of any medication that may interfere with weight loss or gastric emptying
  • Severe coagulopathy
  • Esophageal or gastric varices and/or portal hypertensive gastropathy
  • Underlying uncontrolled endocrine problem that leads to obesity. (e.g. Hypothyroidism, Cushing syndrome, eating disorder etc.)
  • Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract (including but not limited to severe (LA Grade C or D) esophagitis, active gastric ulceration, active duodenal ulceration, or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease)
  • Malignancy
  • Pregnant or breast feeding
  • Patients not fit for general anesthesia
  • ASA grade IV or V
  • Mental or psychiatric disorder; Drug or alcohol addiction
  • Other cases deemed by the examining physician as unsuitable for safe treatment
  • Refusal to participate

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Body weightbaseline, 1,3,6,12 months

Weight change compared to baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Adverse eventswithin 30 days of procedure

Adverse events relating to endoscopic intervention, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)

Technical success rate1 day

successful completion of endoscopic procedures

Serum ghrelin levelsbaseline, 3,6,12 months

Serum ghrelin levels compared to baseline

Blood pressurebaseline, 1,3,6,12 months

Blood pressure and anti-hypertensive medication use compared to baseline

Lipid profilebaseline, 3,6,12 months

Lipid profile compared to baseline

Pain scale after procedure3 days

measured by visual analogue scale (0:no pain - 10:worst pain)

Change in Quality of Lifebaseline, 3,6,12 months

measured by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire - (score 0:worst - 100:best)

Gastric emptying symptomsbaseline, 3,6,12 months

measured by gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) - (0:best - 45:worst)

Eating behaviorsbaseline, 3,6,12 months

measured by Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) - (21:worst - 84:best)

Fasting glucose levelbaseline, 3,6,12 months

levels compared to baseline

Insulin levelbaseline, 3,6,12 months

levels compared to baseline

HbA1c levelbaseline, 3,6,12 months

levels compared to baseline

hepatic steatosis indexbaseline, 3,6,12 months

level compared to baseline

NAFLD fibrosisbaseline, 3,6,12 months

NAFLD fibrosis scores compared to baseline (F0: no liver fibrosis - F4: significant liver fibrosis)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Chinese University of Hong Kong

🇭🇰

Shatin, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath