ESG with Fundal Mucosal Ablation
- Conditions
- Obesity and Obesity-related Medical Conditions
- Registration Number
- NCT06790329
- Lead Sponsor
- Chinese University of Hong Kong
- Brief Summary
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) have emerged as an effective primary endoscopic therapy for weight loss. While ESG recapitulates the configuration of a gastric sleeve, it has not yet been shown to achieve as robust weight loss outcomes compared to the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). A major difference between ESG and LSG is that the former does not involve the gastric fundus and therefore does not lead to decrease in fasting plasma ghrelin after procedure.
Recently, a new endoscopic technique involving the ablation of the gastric fundus has been developed, showing promising results with a reduction in fasting plasma ghrelin levels and a mean total body weight loss of 7.7%. Combining endoscopic gastric fundus mucosal ablation with ESG could potentially enhance the weight loss effects of ESG while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.
This pilot study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and physiological effects of combining endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty with fundal mucosal ablation (ESG-FUMA) in obese patients eligible for endoscopic bariatric therapies.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- BMI equal or more than 30kg/m2 (27.5kg/m2 for Chinese or South Asian) to 40kg/m2, or BMI equal or more than 40kg/m2 and patient is either high risk for surgery or unwilling to undergo surgery, AND
- failed standard obesity therapy of diet, exercise, behavior modification, and pharmacologic agents either alone or in combination
- Previous upper GI surgery (e.g. bariatric surgery, anti-reflux surgery; gastrectomy; esophageal surgery)
- Previous ESG
- Gastroparesis
- Active smoking
- An ongoing or a history of treatment with opioids in the last 12 months prior to enrollment
- Previous pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty
- Gastrointestinal obstruction
- Use of any medication that may interfere with weight loss or gastric emptying
- Severe coagulopathy
- Esophageal or gastric varices and/or portal hypertensive gastropathy
- Underlying uncontrolled endocrine problem that leads to obesity. (e.g. Hypothyroidism, Cushing syndrome, eating disorder etc.)
- Any inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract (including but not limited to severe (LA Grade C or D) esophagitis, active gastric ulceration, active duodenal ulceration, or specific inflammation such as Crohn's disease)
- Malignancy
- Pregnant or breast feeding
- Patients not fit for general anesthesia
- ASA grade IV or V
- Mental or psychiatric disorder; Drug or alcohol addiction
- Other cases deemed by the examining physician as unsuitable for safe treatment
- Refusal to participate
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Body weight baseline, 1,3,6,12 months Weight change compared to baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse events within 30 days of procedure Adverse events relating to endoscopic intervention, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)
Technical success rate 1 day successful completion of endoscopic procedures
Serum ghrelin levels baseline, 3,6,12 months Serum ghrelin levels compared to baseline
Blood pressure baseline, 1,3,6,12 months Blood pressure and anti-hypertensive medication use compared to baseline
Lipid profile baseline, 3,6,12 months Lipid profile compared to baseline
Pain scale after procedure 3 days measured by visual analogue scale (0:no pain - 10:worst pain)
Change in Quality of Life baseline, 3,6,12 months measured by 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) questionnaire - (score 0:worst - 100:best)
Gastric emptying symptoms baseline, 3,6,12 months measured by gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) - (0:best - 45:worst)
Eating behaviors baseline, 3,6,12 months measured by Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) - (21:worst - 84:best)
Fasting glucose level baseline, 3,6,12 months levels compared to baseline
Insulin level baseline, 3,6,12 months levels compared to baseline
HbA1c level baseline, 3,6,12 months levels compared to baseline
hepatic steatosis index baseline, 3,6,12 months level compared to baseline
NAFLD fibrosis baseline, 3,6,12 months NAFLD fibrosis scores compared to baseline (F0: no liver fibrosis - F4: significant liver fibrosis)
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong
ðŸ‡ðŸ‡°Shatin, Hong Kong