A Safety and Efficacy Study of Prograf in the Prevention of Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy
- Conditions
- Erectile DysfunctionProstate Cancer
- Interventions
- Drug: Placebo
- Registration Number
- NCT00106392
- Lead Sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Inc
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of Prograf in the prevention of erectile dysfunction in men after a radical prostatectomy.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Prograf versus placebo in the prevention of erectile dysfunction in men after a bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 131
- Male scheduled to undergo bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
- Patient is > 65 years of age
- Patient has been diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
- Patient is actively smoking on a daily basis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Tacrolimus Tacrolimus Preoperatively: Tacrolimus 2 mg oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Tacrolimus 3 mg oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up. Placebo Placebo Preoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Erectile Function Domain Score Between Treated and Untreated Groups 18 months Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The erectile function domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. The scores range from 1 to 30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Patients Considered Successful Responders to Impotence Medications 24 months Patients were identified as successful responders if they answered affirmatively in the Patient Sexual Encounter Diary regarding successful sexual intercourse after using impotence medication.
Percentage of Patients Achieving Normal Spontaneous Erectile Function as Measured by the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score 24 months Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The erectile function domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. The scores range from 1 to 30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.
Percentages represent the proportions of participants who achieved normal erectile function at any time during the 24 months.Time Taken to Achieve Normalization of the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score 24 months Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The EF domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. Scores range from 1-30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.Time to achieve normalization of the EF domain score was calculated based on the date of the assessment during which the EF domain score was first greater than or equal to 24.
Time to Achieve Response to Impotence Medications 24 months Time to achieve response to impotence medication was calculated based on the date of the assessment during which the first successful response was recorded. The specific date of the actual response is not reflected; only that it occurred since the previous study visit.
Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire 24 months Part 1 Urinary Function- Prostate Health-Related Quality-of-Life (QOL) Questionnaire consists of 16 questions asking patients about their continence and urinary habits over the previous four weeks. The responses to all 16 of these questions were added together to calculate an overall score for urinary function. The minimum possible score is 16 and the maximum possible score is 79. A higher score indicates a lower continence level.