MedPath

A Safety and Efficacy Study of Prograf in the Prevention of Erectile Dysfunction After Radical Prostatectomy

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Erectile Dysfunction
Prostate Cancer
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT00106392
Lead Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Inc
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of Prograf in the prevention of erectile dysfunction in men after a radical prostatectomy.

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Prograf versus placebo in the prevention of erectile dysfunction in men after a bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
131
Inclusion Criteria
  • Male scheduled to undergo bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient is > 65 years of age
  • Patient has been diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
  • Patient is actively smoking on a daily basis

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
TacrolimusTacrolimusPreoperatively: Tacrolimus 2 mg oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Tacrolimus 3 mg oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up.
PlaceboPlaceboPreoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily from 4 to 10 days prior to surgery through hospital discharge; Postoperatively: Matching placebo oral daily at time of hospital discharge through 6 months of follow up.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Erectile Function Domain Score Between Treated and Untreated Groups18 months

Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The erectile function domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. The scores range from 1 to 30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Patients Considered Successful Responders to Impotence Medications24 months

Patients were identified as successful responders if they answered affirmatively in the Patient Sexual Encounter Diary regarding successful sexual intercourse after using impotence medication.

Percentage of Patients Achieving Normal Spontaneous Erectile Function as Measured by the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score24 months

Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The erectile function domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. The scores range from 1 to 30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.

Percentages represent the proportions of participants who achieved normal erectile function at any time during the 24 months.

Time Taken to Achieve Normalization of the Erectile Function (EF) Domain Score24 months

Erectile function was assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire, which consists of 15 questions. The EF domain score is calculated as a sum of scores from questions 1-5 and 15. A clinically meaningful difference is 5 points. Scores range from 1-30 points where a higher score indicates better erectile function. Normal erectile function is defined as greater than or equal to 24 points.Time to achieve normalization of the EF domain score was calculated based on the date of the assessment during which the EF domain score was first greater than or equal to 24.

Time to Achieve Response to Impotence Medications24 months

Time to achieve response to impotence medication was calculated based on the date of the assessment during which the first successful response was recorded. The specific date of the actual response is not reflected; only that it occurred since the previous study visit.

Continence Level as Quantified by Part I of the Prostate Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire24 months

Part 1 Urinary Function- Prostate Health-Related Quality-of-Life (QOL) Questionnaire consists of 16 questions asking patients about their continence and urinary habits over the previous four weeks. The responses to all 16 of these questions were added together to calculate an overall score for urinary function. The minimum possible score is 16 and the maximum possible score is 79. A higher score indicates a lower continence level.

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.