MedPath

Study Comparing Immune Response to, and Safety of, Fluviral and Fluzone Influenza Vaccines in Persons 50 y.o. and Over

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Influenza
Registration Number
NCT00232947
Lead Sponsor
ID Biomedical Corporation, Quebec
Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to determine whether the immune responses induced by Fluviral, the investigational vaccine, are comparable to those induced by Fluzone, which is an influenza vaccine currently licensed in the U.S. The study focuses on persons 50 years old and over. In addition, the study will compare the rate of reactions to the two vaccines, and the general health of persons who receive them over the 42 days after immunization.

Detailed Description

Yearly influenza epidemics are responsible for excess hospitalizations and deaths in the elderly population, and also cause lost work and productivity among the healthy, working elderly. Fluviral, a product now licensed in Canada, is being tested to determine whether it is as active in causing immune responses, and as safe as a currently licensed U.S. vaccine in persons 50 y.o. and over.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
900
Inclusion Criteria
  • Stable health status
  • Access to a consistent means of telephone contact.
  • Comprehension of study requirements, availability for study duration
  • Availability and ability to attend scheduled visits
  • Females post menopausal, sterile or using accepted contraceptive measures
  • Competence to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of significant acute or chronic medical or neuropsych. illness
  • New medical or surgical treatment w/i 1 month
  • Change in medication dose due to uncontrolled symptoms w/i 1 month
  • Hospitalization w/i 1 month
  • Any unusual risk (for age group) of serious adverse events w/i 1 month
  • Any neuropsychiatric condition altering competence for consent
  • Any neuropsychiatric condition preventing accurate safety reports
  • Febrile illness on day of treatment
  • Employment in professions at high risk of influenza transmission
  • Residence in a long-term-care facility or with an immunocompromised person
  • Systolic BP over 150, diastolic over 90, resting pulse under 50 or over 100
  • Cancer w/i 3 years
  • Immunosuppressive of immunodeficient conditions
  • Treatment with systemic glucocorticoids > replacement
  • Treatment with cytotoxic or immunosuppressant drugs
  • Treatment with immune globulins
  • Clotting disorders that increase the risks of intramuscular injections
  • History of demyelinating disease or GBS
  • Pregnancy or nursing
  • Absence of contraceptive practices in women with childbearing potential
  • Planned administration of non-influenza vaccines within 30 days
  • Receipt of any investigational drug within 30 days
  • Receipt of immune globulin treatment within 3 months
  • Known or suspected allergy to egg proteins, gelatin, or thimerosal
  • History of severe adverse reactions toflu vaccines
  • Prior receipt of 2005-6 influenza vaccine

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate of signficant rises in serum antibody titers against viruses in the vaccines.
Geometric mean serum antibody titers on day 21.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rates of specific, solicited vaccine reactogenicicty complaints.
Rates of adverse events.

Trial Locations

Locations (8)

Vince and Associates Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

University of Rochester Medical Center

🇺🇸

Rochester, New York, United States

The Center for Pharmaceutical Research

🇺🇸

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

University Clinical Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Regional Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Endwell, New York, United States

Omega Medical Research

🇺🇸

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

PI-Coor Clinical Research

🇺🇸

Fairfax, Virginia, United States

Radiant Research

🇺🇸

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath