Comparison of Time Taken for Intubation and Cormack Lehane View Between C-Mac With Glidescope Video Laryngoscopy in Paediatric Patients
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Paediatric Airway
- Registration Number
- NCT04145089
- Lead Sponsor
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
- Brief Summary
This study compares the time taken to intubate between Cmac video laryngoscopy with Glidescope video laryngoscopy in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years old.
- Detailed Description
This study aims to determine whether are both devices comparable to each other in terms of intubation time and Cormack Lehane view in paediatric patients with normal airway undergoing elective surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
Inclusion Criteria
- Paediatric patients 3-12 years old undergoing elective surgery
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1-2
- No difficult airway features/history of difficult intubation
- Not obese
Exclusion Criteria
- Any difficult intubation features/history of difficult intubation
- Obese child
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intubation time 5 minutes Time taken from insertion of specified laryngoscope blade to lip until presence of capnography tracing
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cormack Lehane view 5 minutes grade from 1-4 by operator's assesment
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia