MedPath

Clinical Evaluation of 4D Flow Cardiac MRI Sequences

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Indication, Unlabeled
Interventions
Device: MR data acquisition
Registration Number
NCT03986645
Lead Sponsor
Emanuela Valsangiacomo
Brief Summary

Assess the accuracy of 4D flow cardiac MRI to measure blood flow and velocity, delineate 3D cardiac anatomy and visualize flow dynamics using two (2) different pulse sequences.

Detailed Description

Advances in pediatric (cardiac) surgery, interventional techniques and medical care have improved survival for children born with congenital heart disease. Assessment of blood flow and pressures within the heart plays an integral role in the management of patients with congenital or acquired structural heart disease aiding with diagnoses, surveillance for complications, in relation to surgical or catheter procedures, and for therapeutic decision making. Current gold standard, direct intracardiac measurement of flow and pressures is an invasive procedure, while non-invasive echography-Doppler is limited by poor acoustic windows and operator dependency.

Therefore, cardiac MRI (cMRI) has been recommended as an important alternative in imaging of pediatric heart disease. Current clinical standard for MR flow imaging is 2-dimensional providing flow in a single cross-sectional plane. Current clinical CMR protocols in pediatric congenital heart disease are time consuming, depend on technician's experience and require direct supervision by an experienced cardiovascular imaging specialist. 4D Flow is a new approach for cMRI that might overcome these disadvantages. It allows scanning of the entire chest in approximately 7 minutes (depending on field of view, heart rate and resolution). The images can be off-line reconstructed in any plane, avoiding the need to precisely define crosssectional planes during acquisition for each vessel. Owing to time resolved visualizations of intracardiac flow dynamics occult jets or dynamic jets might be more likely to be detected. Potential disadvantages, rsp. potential advantages to be confirmed include lower temporal resolution of 4D sequences than current 2D sequences, unknown consequences of gradient artefacts induced by new velocity encoding schemes and diagnostic plausibility of disease related image features .

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
4DFLOWMR data acquisitionAcquire MR 4DFLow data.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Feasibility of data processingWithin 72 hours after completion of exam

Comparison of flow velocities and blood flow measured by 4D flow cMRI pulse sequences against phantom corrected 2D cMRI data.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Image qualityWithin 72 hours after completion of exam

Qualitative grading of 4D flow cMRI anatomical images for image quality using a numerical scale.

Clinical valueWithin 72 hours after completion of exam

Qualitative grading of clinical and diagnostic value of visualizations of flow dynamics using a numerical scale.

ComparabilityWithin 72 hours after completion of exam

Qualitative grading of comparability of anatomical findings in 4D flow cMRI anatomical images with contrast-enhanced MR angiography images, if these have been acquired during the clinical examination of patients, using a numerical scale.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath