Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04341350
NCT04341350
Recruiting
Phase 3

Comparison of an Inhaled Sedation Strategy to an Intravenous Sedation Strategy in Intensive Care Unit Patients Treated With Invasive Mechanical Ventilation : INASED Study

University Hospital, Brest12 sites in 1 country250 target enrollmentAugust 6, 2020

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Propofol + analgesic drug
Conditions
Prevention of Delirium
Sponsor
University Hospital, Brest
Enrollment
250
Locations
12
Primary Endpoint
Occurrence of a delirium in intensive care
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to determine the impact on the frequency of occurrence of delirium of an early inhaled sedation strategy (from induction in rapid sequence if intubation in intensive care, or from admission if intubated in pre -hospital) by Isoflurane using an ANACONDA ™ type system, compared to a conventional intravenous sedation strategy.

Detailed Description

Sedation-analgesia is used in most patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV). The usual benzodiazepine and morphine sedation reduces pain and anxiety and allows tolerance of invasive procedures in intensive care. These molecules, used as part of the sedation titration protocol or the daily sedation stop protocol, have improved patient outcomes. Although necessary, these drugs, by mechanisms still uncertain, would promote the occurrence of resuscitation delirium. Delirium itself responsible for worsening morbidity and mortality (increase in the duration of MV, increase in the length of hospital stay, discussed increase in mortality, long-term cognitive sequelae). This finding favored the use of new drugs in the sedation strategies of patients on MV. Dexmedetomidine has for example reduced the number of days of delirium, the number of days of coma and even mortality in septic patients. Its large-scale use has however been questioned by a recent study. Halogenated gases have been used for a long time in anesthesia. Their pharmacodynamics, their positive and adverse effects, their therapeutic margins are well known. Thanks to technical innovations they can be used on resuscitation respirators. Several studies on targeted populations have shown the feasibility and the benefits of this use, in particular, the absence of accumulation, the absence of tachyphylaxis, the broad therapeutic range, the small interindividual variation, the rapidity of efficacy and the speed of awakening. Safety in use for the staff in charge of the patient is established. In addition, their potential neuroprotective effect would make it an anesthetic of choice in the prevention of resuscitation delirium.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 6, 2020
End Date
August 2026
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient aged 18 and over
  • Patient requiring mechanical ventilation for at least 24 hours
  • The patient requires continuous and immediate sedation for more comfort, safety and to facilitate the administration of survival measures.
  • Consent obtained from patient or relative

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient hospitalized for the following reasons for admission:
  • Cardiac arrest
  • State of refractory epilepticus
  • Head trauma
  • Hearing, visual or aphasia disorders before inclusion making it impossible to take the CAM-ICU
  • Sedation started more than 24 hours ago
  • Impairment of cognitive functions and / or dementia
  • Contraindication to halogenated gases (personal or family history of malignant hyperthermia, acute or chronic neuromuscular disease, hepatocellular insufficiency with PT \<30%)
  • Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Berlin criteria: PaO2 / FiO2 \<100 after ventilatory optimisation))
  • PaCO2 at inclusion\> 50 mmHg after ventilatory optimisation

Arms & Interventions

Usual sedation

Sedation according to a written, standardized Nurse management protocol using at least one sedative drug (propofol) and one analgesic drug.

Intervention: Propofol + analgesic drug

Inhaled sedation

Sedation by inhalation of halogenated gas (Isoflurane) delivered by the Anesthetic-Conserving Device (ACD) system ANACONDA ™ associated with the administration of an analgesic drug.

Intervention: Isoflurane + analgesic drug

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Occurrence of a delirium in intensive care

Time Frame: 28 days

Occurrence of delirium in intensive care will be observed (yes / no)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Incidence of delirium(28 days)
  • Mortality in intensive care(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Mortality at day 28(28 days)
  • Hospital cost per patient(Through study completion, an average of 1 year.)
  • Number of days with vasopressors or inotropic agents(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Duration of delirium(28 days)
  • Requirement of patients physical restraints(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Duration of anesthetics drugs(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Length of ICU stay(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Hetero-aggressive act(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Number of days with sedation(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Cumulative dose anesthetics drugs(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Maximum dose of vasopressors or inotropic agents(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Ventilation free days at 28 days following randomisation(28 days)
  • Self aggressive act(Throuh exit from the intensive care unit, an average of 28 days)
  • Evaluation of cognitive functions(Through study completion, an average of 1 year.)

Study Sites (12)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials