Comparison of Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam withPropofol for Proseal LMA Insertio
Phase 1
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: 4- Measurement and Monitoring
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/03/063738
- Lead Sponsor
- ACS Medical College and Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
elective short surgical procedure of ASA 1 and 2
under general anasthesia
weight between 30 to 80 kg
Exclusion Criteria
ASA 3 OR MORE
Patient refusal
anticipated difficult airway
increased risk of aspiration{pregnancy,GERD,hiatus hernia}
full stomach patient
alergic to study drugs
morbid obesity
patient requiring emergency operative procedure
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To Compare the Ease of Insertion of Proseal LMA, Hemodynamic Stablity, Respiratory Stability and Mean Recovery With Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam with Propofol.Timepoint: To compare the Ease of Insertion of Proseal LMA, Hemodynamic Stability, Respiratory Stability and Mean Recovery With Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam with Propofol and Monitored for 1 minutes, 3 minutes, 5minutes, 10 minutes and 15 minutes.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method to look for changes in hemodynamic variations andincidence of post operative sedationTimepoint: base line,pre induction,1 min 5 min 10 min,15 minutes after the procedure for every 15 min till 1hour post operatively