MedPath

Remifentanil Versus Sufentanil for Intubation Condition Without Myorelaxant

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Anaesthetic Induction
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT01910285
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Toulouse
Brief Summary

The main objective is the comparison of intubation conditions after anesthetic induction bolus of propofol-sufentanil when compared to injection of propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing surgery for tooth extraction.

Intubation without myorelaxant with propofol and sufentanil is classic but less efficient than induction with curare on achieving perfect intubation conditions. The use of a protocol without curare is sometimes justified for short gestures or when you want to avoid allergia. Remifentanil often provides excellent intubation conditions without myorelaxant. However, remifentanil was never compared to sufentanil in terms of intubating conditions without muscle relaxant.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients 18 to 60 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) 1 or 2
  • scheduled for surgical tooth extraction under general anesthesia with intubation
  • signed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
  • criterion of difficult ventilation or intubation
  • chronic alcoholism or opiate use
  • beta-blockers or calcium channel blockers treatment
  • allergy to paracetamol or ketoprofen
  • patient under protection of justice

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Remifentanyl- sufentanil placeboRemifentanyl - sufentanil placebo3 mg/kg of propofol combined with 3 µg/kg of remifentanil
Sufentanil - remifentanyl placeboSufentanil - remifentanyl placebo3 mg/kg of propofol combined with 0.3 mg/kg of sufentanil
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Scandinavian Scale of Intubation Conditions (from Viby-Mogensen). The comparison will be made on the percentage of obtaining excellent intubation conditions.This outcome measure is assessed at day 1 during the per-anesthetic period.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
percentage of patient with a decrease of over 20% in Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) or Heart Rate (HR)This outcome measure is assessed at day 1 during the per-anesthesic period and the monitoring period in PACU.
breath - hold time - time to extubation, time to Aldrete score of 10 in PostAnesthesia Care Unit (PACU)This outcome measure is assessed at day 1 during the per-anesthesic period and the monitoring period in PACU.
difficult intubating scale (Adnet et al. Anesthesiology. 99)This outcome measure is assessed at day 1 during the per-anesthesic period and the monitoring period in PACU.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital of Purpan

🇫🇷

Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath