MedPath

High Dose Inspiratory Muscle Training in LOPD

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Late-Onset Pompe Disease
Lysosomal Disease
Interventions
Device: IMT therapy using the Pr02 mobile device
Registration Number
NCT05431127
Lead Sponsor
Duke University
Brief Summary

Study Objectives: 1) assess the safety and feasibility of high-dose inspiratory muscle training (IMT) delivered remotely in Late-onset Pompe Disease (LOPD) and 2) determine its effects on respiratory and patient-reported outcomes.

Detailed Description

This study aims to develop treatments that enhance respiratory strength and function to provide meaningful clinical improvements for people with LOPD. Identification of a cost-effective adjunctive intervention to address respiratory weakness remains critical to reduce disease burden, ease activity limitations and participation restrictions, and improve health-related quality of life. The proposed study will provide a high-dose inspiratory muscle training (IMT) stimulus to enhance treatment efficacy and efficiency. Our hypothesis is that high-dose IMT is necessary to produce meaningful changes in respiratory muscle strength and other outcomes in participants with LOPD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
29
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Confirmed diagnosis of LOPD
  • MIP >50% of predicted for sex and age
  • Stable on current Pompe disease treatment regimen >6 months
  • Able to follow directions for study participation
  • Access to computer and smartphone/tablet with reliable internet connection for video visits and sensor-based respiratory technologies
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of medical comorbidities that prevent meaningful study participation (e.g., COPD GOLD III-IV, significant mental illness, dementia)
  • Use of continuous invasive or non-invasive ventilation while awake
  • Prior history of gene therapy for LOPD
  • Inability to give legally effective consent
  • Inability to read and understand English

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
High Dose Inspiratory Muscle TrainingIMT therapy using the Pr02 mobile deviceInspiratory Muscle Training 3 times a week over 26 weeks
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post test, measured in cm H20

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in peak expiratory flow (PEF)Baseline, week 15, week 30

change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second using portable hand-held spirometer

Change in inspiratory phase duration (IPD)Baseline, week 15, week 30

change pre-test to post-test, measured in seconds

Change in compression phase duration (CPD)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured in seconds

Change in forced vital capacity (FVC)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters using a portable hand-held spirometer

Change in impact of fatigue on quality of life (QOL)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) survey completion using a score of 0 (never affected) to 4 (almost always affected). The total score ranges from 0 to a maximum of 84. Higher scores indicate greater impact of fatigue on quality of life.

Change in voice qualityBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) survey completion using a 5-point scale (0=never, 1=almost never, 2=sometimes, 3=almost always, 4=always). Item responses are added to obtain a total score (values \>11 abnormal) with higher scores indicating greater perception of voice-related handicap.

Change in forced expiratory volume over 1 second (FEV1)Baseline, week 15, week 30

change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second using a portable hand-held spirometer

Change in maximum expiratory pressure (MEP)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post test, measured in cm H20

Change in inspiratory peak flow (IPF)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second

Change in expiratory phase rise time (EPRT)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured in liters per second

Change in fatigueBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) survey completion, using a 7 point ordinal scale where a rating of 1 indicates strong disagreement and a rating of 7 indicates strong agreement.

Change in daytime sleepinessBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) survey completion using a 0 to 3 ordinal scale in which 0=no chance of dozing, 1=slight chance of dozing, 2= moderate chance of dozing, and 3=high chance of dozing. Scores are summed to obtain total ESS score where a score \>10 reflects excessive daytime sleepiness.

Change in respiratory symptomsBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Respiratory Symptoms Questionnaire (RSQ) completion using a 0-3 scale where a higher score indicates worse symptoms.

Change in ability to communicateBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Communicative Participation Item Bank-Short From (CPIB-10) survey completion using a 4-point scale (not at all=3, a little=2, quite a bit=1, very much=0). Item scores are added to obtain the summary score which ranges from 0-30. This can be transformed into a standard T score (mean=50, SD=10). Higher scores represent less interference in communication participation.

Change in cough volume acceleration (CVA)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by EPF/EPRT

Change in sleep qualityBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) survey completion. The PSQI is a 9-question, 19-item instrument. Items 1 to 4 are open-ended questions (customary bedtime, length of time to fall asleep). Items 5 to 8 (including the 10 questions comprising item 5) are sleep symptoms which are rated as to their frequency using an ordinal scale: 0=not occurring in the last month, 1=less than once a week, 2=once or twice a week, and 3=three or more times a week. Item 9 is a rating of overall sleep quality over the past month using a 0 to 3 ordinal scale: 0=very good; 1=fairly good; 2= fairly bad; and 3=very bad. Scores from the 19-items are combined according to standard scoring criteria to obtain a Global PSQI score. Scores \>5 indicate reduced sleep quality.

Change in motor performanceBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Rotterdam Handicap Scale (RHS) survey completion using a ranging scale of 1 - 4 where 1 = unable to fulfil the task or activity and 4 = complete fulfillment of the task or activity. Scores are summed and range from 9-36.

Change in health-related quality of lifeBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey completion where physical and mental component summary scales (PCS and MCS) are calculated from the subscales and transformed to a normalized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores represent better health-related quality of life.

Change in swallowing symptomsBaseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post-test, measured by Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) survey completion using a 5-point scale (0=no problem, 4=severe problem). Item responses are added to obtain a total score (values \>3 abnormal) with higher scores indicating greater severity of swallowing symptoms.

Change in inspiratory power curve (IPC)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post test, measured in pressure-time units (PTUs)

Change in inspiratory duration (ID)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post test, measured by duration in seconds

Change in fatigue index test score (FIT)Baseline, week 15, week 30

Change pre-test to post test, a proprietary measure which quantifies propensity to inspiratory muscle fatigue based upon the relationship between inspiratory capacity and demand using the following equation: (IPC \[in Watts\] x MID) / (Power500 x T500), where Power500 = power expended to inspire a mass of 500 mL air and T500 = time when mass of inspired air=500 mL at sea level

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Duke University Medical Center

🇺🇸

Durham, North Carolina, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath