Comparision of video laryngoscope with routine laryngoscope for nasal intubation.
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: S024- Fracture of malar, maxillary and zygoma bones
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/05/025196
- Lead Sponsor
- HSK hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
1.patients posted for elective maxillo facial and ent surgeries under general anaesthesia for nasotracheal intubation.
2.patient belongs to ASA 1 and 2
3.patient with age 20-65years
Exclusion Criteria
1.Patients refusal to participate in the study 2.Patients with limited mouth opening of less than 3cm
3.History of documented difficult tracheal intubation
4.Cervical spine instability
5.Chronic suppurative sinusitis
6.Ankylosis of temporomandibular joint
7.Nasal bone fractures.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the total intubation time and each time interval as follows, <br/ ><br>time A- placement of the nasotracheal tube from selected nostril to oropharynx; <br/ ><br>time B- use of devices to view the glottic opening; <br/ ><br>time C- nasotracheal tube advanced from oropharynx into trachea and removal of the scope form oral cavity. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: total time for intubation and each time intervals will be measured during the intubation.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method -To compare scores of modified nasointubation difficulty scale (MNIDS) <br/ ><br>-Hemodynamic responses (MAP and HR) <br/ ><br>Timepoint: -MNIDS score will assessed after successfull intubation <br/ ><br>-Hemodynamic responses (MAP and HR) will be assessed before and after intubation