Comparison of video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in adult patient posted for surgeries under general anesthesia
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2022/07/043852
- Lead Sponsor
- SPARSH FOUNDATIO
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Patient who give informed consent.
2. Adult patient of both the Genders
3. Age >18 years and <60 years
4. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I to II
5. Modified Mallampati (Samsoon & Young) Airway class I and II
Exclusion Criteria
1. Refusal by the patient to be part of the study.
2. Emergency surgeries
3. Risk of aspiration (non fasted, severe gastro-oesophageal disease, hiatal hernia)
4. Known or anticipated difficult airways (BMI > 35kg/m2, Modified Mallampati Airway > class III, Thyromental distance < 6cm, Inter incisor distance <3.5cm )
5. Known difficult mask ventilation, difficult laryngoscopy / scheduled for awake tracheal intubation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. With respect to glottic (laryngoscopic) view (POGO score/ cormack lehane grading) <br/ ><br>2. Time for successful intubation <br/ ><br>3. Intubation success rate (number of attempts) <br/ ><br>4. Difficult intubation score <br/ ><br>Timepoint: Before and during intubation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Optimization maneuvers required to aid tracheal intubation, <br/ ><br>2. Adverse events and technical problems <br/ ><br>Timepoint: During and after intubation