A comparison of King Vision video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy as performed by residents
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Patients with no predictors of difficult airway were randomized to intubation by direct laryngoscopy or by King Vision video laryngoscopy
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000018077
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 88
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Suspected full stomach (Incomplete fasting, chronic opioid use, uncompensated diabetes, obstructive abdominal pathology or ileus) Mouth opening < 4 cm Cervical flexion and extension limitations Mallampati IV Difficult ventilation prior to intubation Known difficult airway Presence of cervical lesion Presence of masses or neoplasms in airway Craniofacial deformity Any other reason raised by the anesthesiologist
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficacy of the King Vision video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in patients with no predictors of difficult airway by Anesthesiology first year residents at University Hospital Fundacion Santa Fe de Bogota during the year 2013
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method