Evaluation of Three School-based Mental Health Preventive Interventions in France
- Conditions
- Emotional DistressFunctional ImpairmentUser ExperiencePsychosocial ProblemWellbeing
- Registration Number
- NCT06059092
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Nimes
- Brief Summary
To meet adolescents' needs regarding mental health vulnerability, this study aims to propose and evaluate three original school-based preventive interventions delivered to French 13y-adolescents, with respect to their effects on mental health outcomes, as well as users' experiences of intervention, evaluated through questionnaires. Based on cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) techniques, these interventions target three strategic process areas: reactive adaptation, proactive adaptation, and interpersonal adaptation. Their effectiveness will be evaluated through a four-arm randomized controlled trial, conducted in an ecological context. Intra-group and inter-group comparisons will be carried out for our different variables of interest, namely targeted psychological processes, levels of distress, functional impairment, and well-being, and user experience indicators of acceptability, utility, and usability.
- Detailed Description
The three interventions will be delivered in school facilities, during school time, with 4th-grade middle school students, by one psychologist trained in CBT and one undergraduate student in clinical psychology in CBT. They involve participating in three one-hour weekly sessions, plus one booster sessions one month later. These three programs have been designed based on pre-existing knowledge about adolescents and their cognitive-motivational mechanisms, in order to promote their learning and receptiveness to interventions, and include group and individual activities meant to improve key psychological processes. The control group will consist of the same number of sessions of identical length as experimental conditions, dedicated to serious games meant to work on cognitive functions (attention, memory, logical reasoning).
For all participants, several indicators of mental health and of cognitive-behavioral processes will be measured through validated self- and parent-reported questionnaires, and completed by user experience questionnaires. Mixt linear models or non-parametric equivalent tests will be conducted to test hypotheses (i.e., positive change in all outcomes following interventions in the experimental conditions, not observed in the participants of the control group).
The interventions are preventive and will not target adolescents at risk for psychopathological conditions. Nevertheless, it is possible that at-risk individuals are enrolled in the sample. To meet special needs of some participants, from the beginning of the study, professional mental health resources (phone number, websites, institutions) will be provided to all participants. A clinical psychologist (one of tthe animator) will be available for students who would ask for individual appointments by handling duty periods in school facilities two hours a week during the interventions.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- being enrolled in one of the middle school involved in the study
- parent and student consent for participation
- parent and student proficiency in French
- absence or withdrawal of consent (parent or student)
- missing more than 1 in 4 sessions
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method General distress Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Anxiety and depressive symptoms (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). A high score on each subscale (anxiety symptoms subscale, 7 items, and depression symptoms subscale, 7 items), ranging from 0 to 21, indicates a high level of anxiety or depression. A high composite score (addition of scores yielded by the 2 subscales), ranging from 0 to 42, indicates a high level of general distress.
Type of coping strategies Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Brief-COPE. A high score on each of the 14 strategies subscales (e.g., denial, acceptance, planning, disengagement), ranging from 2 to 8, indicates a frequent use of each strategy.
Tendency to engage in committed action Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Willingness and Action Measurement for Children and Adolescents (WAM-C/a), Action subscales. A high score (ranging from 9 to 45) indicate a high tendency do carry out actions related to important personal values despite negative feelings.
Wellbeing Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Psychological, social and emotional well-being (Mental Health Continuum-Short Form). A high score on each emotional, social, and psychological wellbeing subscales, ranging from 3 or 6 to 18 or 36 depending on subscales, indicate a high level of each kind of wellbeing. A high composite score (ranging from 14 to 84) indicates a high level of general wellbeing.
Functional impairment Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Functional impairment in school, social, personal, domestic areas (Work and Social Adjustment Scale for Youth; WSAS-Y). A high score (ranging from 0 to 40) indicates a high level of functional impairment across these life areas.
Psychosocial difficulties Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Psychosocial difficulties of various internalized and externalized natures, measured by the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC). A high score (ranging from 0 to 70) indicates a high level of psychosocial difficulties.
General Self-Efficacy Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test General Self Efficacy scale-Short-form (S-GSES). A high score (ranging from 3 to 15) indicates a high level of general self-efficacy.
Assertiveness in interaction Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Ability to express feelings and opinions to others and to respect others (Assertiveness Formative Questionnaire)
Coping Flexibility Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Coping Flexibility Scale. A high score (ranging from 7 to 28) indicates a high level of coping flexibility.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Sociodemographic data 1 Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Adolescents' gender (qualitative questionnaire, unscored)
Sociodemographic data 5 Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Home income (questionnaire, unscored)
Sociodemographic data 2 Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Adolescents' age (questionnaire, unscored)
Sociodemographic data 4 Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Family status (qualitative questionnaire, unscored)
Sociodemographic data 3 Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Adolescents' current and previous diagnoses and treatments qualitative (qualitative questionnaire, unscored)
Sociodemographic data 6 Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Parents' gender, profession, education level (qualitative questionnaire, unscored)
User experience questionnaire Post-test 3 weeks after pre-test, follow-up 3 months after post-test Participants' perceived utility, acceptability, usability and general appreciation of the interventions
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Institut Valsainte
🇫🇷Nîmes, Gard, France
Collège Révolution
🇫🇷Nîmes, Gard, France
Institut Valsainte🇫🇷Nîmes, Gard, FranceClaudine Averseng, DirectorContactdirection@institut-valsainte.fr