MedPath

Pleural Bleomycin vs Mechanical Abrasion in Malignant Pleural Effusion

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Malignant Pleural Effusion
Registration Number
NCT06691009
Lead Sponsor
Assiut University
Brief Summary

Comparision between pleurodesis by pleural abrasion using medical thoracoscopy and bleomycin instillation via indwelling pleural catheter. Evaluating the effectiveness of pleural abrasion using medical thoracoscopy in patients with malignant pleural effusion and evaluating the role of ROSE in diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusion

Detailed Description

Malignant pleural effusion cause significant morbidity so drainage effusion can provide great palliation and improve quality of life of these patients. There are several diagnostic tools for diagnosing malignant pleural effusion as pleural fluid cytology, closed pleural biopsy or thoracosopic pleural biopsy. Medical thoracoscopy has significant role in diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusion. Also, pleurodesis may be performed through it by mechanical methods as pleural abrasion or chemical methods by talc poudrage, bleomycin or cisplatin instillation . and surgically through pleurectomy. Recently, using of ROSE (Rapis On-Site Examination) technique during medical thoracoscopy showed high accuracy for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions, and this help in decision making. In our study, we will use mechanical pleurodesis by pleural abrasion using medical thoracoscpy and chemical pleurodesis by instillation of bleomycin via indwelling pleural catheter.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients who are 18 years old or more.
  • patients with rapidly accumulating moderate & massive malignant pleural. effusion that need frequent aspiration to relieve dyspnea and affect quality of life of the patient.
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients not fit for thoracoscoy.
  • patients with life expectency less than 1 month .
  • trapped lung (endobronchial lesion).
  • excessive pleural adhesios.
  • mild effusion not need frequent aspiration and not affect
  • quality of life .
  • patients with chest infection : pneumonia , empyema .
  • patients with performance status that doesn't expected to increase by 1

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Assessment of successful pleurodesis by chest ultrasound6 months

This will be done every 2 weeks to detect any recollection of fluid in the pleural space. It will be used to determine whether the intervention achieved full or partial success

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Assiut University Faculty of Medicine

🇪🇬

Assiut, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath