MedPath

Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in the Emergency Department (MARS-ED)

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Acute Pain
Emergencies
Interventions
Other: RISK-INDEX
Registration Number
NCT05497830
Lead Sponsor
Maastricht University Medical Center
Brief Summary

Rationale

Identifying emergency department (ED) patients at high and low risk shortly after admission could help decision-making regarding patient care. Several clinical risk scores and triage systems for stratification of patients have been developed, but often underperform in clinical practice. Moreover, most of these risk scores only have been diagnostically validated in an observational cohort, but never have been evaluated for their actual clinical impact. In a recent retrospective study that was conducted in the Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), a novel clinical risk score, the RISKINDEX, was introduced that predicted 31-day mortality of sepsis patients presenting to an ED. The RISKINDEX hereby also outperformed internal medicine specialists. Observational follow-up studies underlined the potential of the risk score. However, it remains unknown to what extent these models have any beneficial value when it is actually implemented in clinical practice.

Objective

To determine the diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of the RISKINDEX as basis to conduct a large scale, multi-center randomised trial.

Study design

The MARS-ED study is designed as a multi-center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority pilot clinical trial.

Study population

Adult patients who are assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist in the ED of whom a minimum of 4 different laboratory results (hematology or clinical chemistry, required for calculation of ML risk score) are available within the first two hours of the ED visit.

Intervention

Physicians will be presented with the ML risk score (the RISKINDEX) of the patients they are actively treating, directly after assessment of regular diagnostics has taken place.

Main study parameters

Primary

- Diagnostic accuracy, policy changes and clinical impact of a novel clinical risk score (the RISKINDEX)

Secondary

* Policy changes due to presentation of ML score (treatment policy, requesting ancillary investigations, treatment restrictions (i.e., no intubation or resuscitation)

* Intensive care (ICU) and medium care (MC) admission

* Length of admission

* Mortality within 31 days

* Readmission

* Patient preference

* Feasibility of novel clinical risk score

Detailed Description

See our protocol paper, PMID 38263188

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
1300
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult, defined as ≥ 18 years of age
  • Assessed and treated by an internal medicine specialist (gastroenterologists included) in the ED
  • Willing to give written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).
Exclusion Criteria
  • <4 different laboratory results available (hematology or clinical chemistry) within the first two hours of the ED visit (calculation ML prediction score otherwise not possible)
  • Unwilling to provide written consent, either directly or after deferred consent procedure (see section 11.2).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
RISKINDEXRISK-INDEXRoutine clinical care. Physicians will actively be asked to self-report their clinical impression of each included patient and policy will be monitored. In the intervention group, physicians will be presented with the RISKINDEX. Subsequently, self-report will again be initiated to evaluate the physicians' response to the ML score and possible policy changes due to the intervention.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
RISK-INDEX performance31 days

Discriminatory performance of ML risk score to predict 31-day mortality. This will be calculated using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

Policy changesAs soon as RISK-INDEX score is presented

Policy changes after presentation of RISK-INDEX. This will be assessed by a filled out questionnaire by the physician where they state whether a policy change has been made as a result of the RISK-INDEX outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Maastricht University Medical Centre

🇳🇱

Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath