Comparison of High-Intensity Interval Training and Medium-Intensity Interval Training on Cardiopulmonary Fitness, Strength and Agility in Athletes
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 36
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Cooper's 12 minutes run/walk test
研究概览
简要总结
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Medium-Intensity Interval Training (MIIT) are popular training methods known for enhancing athletic performance. HIIT is characterized by short bursts of high-intensity exercise followed by brief recovery periods. This training approach typically involves exercising at 80-95% of maximum heart rate for intervals ranging from 20 seconds to a few minutes, followed by rest or lower-intensity activity. Moderate-Interval Training (MIIT), on the other hand, involves moderate-intensity exercise performed at 60-75% of maximum heart rate. The primary objective is to determine how HIIT and MIIT differ in improving CPF, strength, and agility among athletes. A randomized clinical trial will be conducted with a sample size of 80 athletes, divided into two groups. Participants will undergo 45-minute training sessions three times a week for six weeks, followed by pre- and post-intervention assessments using Cooper's 12-Minute Run/Walk Test, T-Test for agility, and Active Force 2 muscle tester for strength. Statistical analyses will be conducted to compare pre- and post-intervention results between the two groups, determining the significance of differences in CRF fitness, strength and agility outcomes.
详细描述
This study is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial designed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and medium-intensity interval training (MIIT) on cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, and agility among trained athletes. The study will be conducted at the Pakistan Cricket Board National Cricket Academy and Hafeez Qadeer Cricket Academy, Lahore, and will be completed within 12 months following synopsis approval. A total of 80 athletes aged 20-30 years will be recruited using non-probability purposive sampling, with 40 participants allocated to each group after accounting for a 10% attrition rate. Eligible participants will include male and female athletes with a BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m² and a minimum of three years of regular sports training. Athletes with a history of fractures, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders, systemic illnesses, sleep disorders, or use of medications affecting cardiovascular or neurological function will be excluded. Participants will be randomized using concealed allocation, and outcome assessment will be performed by a blinded assessor to minimize bias.
Although both HIIT and MIIT have been shown to independently improve physical performance, there is a notable lack of direct comparative evidence evaluating their relative effectiveness in athlete populations. To address this gap, participants will undergo supervised training sessions lasting 45 minutes per day, three days per week, for six weeks. Group A will receive a structured HIIT program involving high-intensity cardio intervals, progressive strength exercises, and agility drills, while Group B will follow a MIIT program consisting of moderate-intensity cardio intervals, strength training, and agility exercises with gradual progression. Outcome measures will be assessed pre- and post-intervention using the Cooper's 12-minute run/walk test for cardiorespiratory fitness, the T-test for agility, and the Active Force 2 device for muscle strength, all of which demonstrate established validity and reliability. This study aims to provide evidence-based insight into the comparative effectiveness of HIIT and MIIT in enhancing multiple components of athletic performance.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 30 Years(Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Age 20-30 years
- •Both male and female
- •Athletes with BMI 18.5kg/m2 -24.9kg/m2
- •Minimum 3 years of regular training in sports
排除标准
- •History of Any fracture or trauma
- •Having any neurological disease
- •Any chronic musculoskeletal disorder
- •Any systemic illnesses
- •Exclude athletes with known sleep disorders(e.g, insomnia ,sleep and apnoea )
- •Athletes having consumption of pharmaceutical drugs e.g Beta blockers, benzodiazepines will be excluded
研究组 & 干预措施
Group A (High Intensity interval Training)
Group A (High Intensity interval Training) Group A will engage in a structured High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) program over a 6-week period, with sessions to enhance cardiopulmonary fitness, strength, and agility.
干预措施: High Intensity Training (Group A) (Other)
Group B (Moderate Intensity Interval Training):
Group B (Moderate Intensity Interval Training):
Group B will participate in a structured Medium-Intensity Interval Training (MIIT) program over a 6-week period, with sessions aimed at gradually improving endurance, strength, and coordination.
干预措施: Medium Intensity Training (Group B) (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Cooper's 12 minutes run/walk test
时间窗: 6 weeks
Cooper's 12 minutes run/walk test (For Cardio respiratory Fitness) The Cooper 12 minute run is a popular maximal running test of aerobic fitness, in which participants try and cover as much distance as they can in 12 minutes. equipment required: flat oval or running track, marker cones, recording sheets, stop watch with a validity of 0.90.
T test Agility (For Agility)
时间窗: 6 weeks
T test Agility (For Agility) The T-test for agility is a reliable and valid measure to assess an individual's quickness and directional change ability. To ensure reliability, the test should be administered multiple times (test-retest reliability) and checked for consistent scoring between trials, ideally resulting in an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) above 0.75, which indicates good reliability. Additionally, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability should be examined if multiple evaluators are involved.
Active Force 2 (For Strength)
时间窗: 6 week
Active Force 2 (For Strength) The Active Force 2 has demonstrated strong validity and reliability in muscle strength assessments. Its concurrent validity is high, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 compared to established dynamometers, and construct validity values above 0.85 align with theoretical expectations for muscle strength measurements. Test-retest reliability values are robust, with intra class correlation coefficients (ICCs) between 0.92 and 0.98, indicating consistency across repeated measures. Additionally, intra-rater reliability ICCs range from 0.90 to 0.96, and inter-rater reliability ICCs from 0.88 to 0.95, reflecting consistent results when measurements are taken by the same or different testers.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
