Brief Intervention for Drug Abusing Adolescents
- Conditions
- Drug Abuse
- Interventions
- Behavioral: brief intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy)
- Registration Number
- NCT00350909
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trail is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief, cognitive-behavioral therapeutic intervention for adolescents reporting mild or moderate drug abuse (MMDA). This school-based initiative employs a collaborative effort between the University of Minnesota researchers and the St. Paul Public Schools. This intervention aims to reduce post-treatment drug use behaviors and enhance drug-use resistant cognitions and problem-solving skills.
- Detailed Description
The purpose of this clinical trail is to evaluate the efficacy of a brief, cognitive-behavioral therapeutic intervention for adolescents reporting mild or moderate drug abuse (MMDA). This school-based initiative employs a collaborative effort between the University of Minnesota researchers and the St. Paul Public Schools. This intervention aims to reduce post-treatment drug use behaviors and enhance drug-use resistant cognitions and problem-solving skills.
Specifically, we propose a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral therapy on key process and outcome dimensions among school-based youth with mild-to-moderate drug abuse (MMDA). The experimental treatment is designated Brief Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (BCBI) given its theoretical foundation in stage of change theory used to coordinate modules on Rational-Emotive Therapy and Problem Solving Therapy. BCBI will be compared against a second experimental treatment that consists of BCBI and a single parent session (BCBI+P) and an assessment only condition (control). The importance of clarifying mechanisms in drug treatment research will be explored with respect to a limited number of treatment and individual factors that have emerged as promising mediating and moderating factors, such as cognitive and problem solving factors, parenting practices, and peer group influences.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 160
- student at a local school
- meets DSM-IV criteria for a substance abuse disorder for at least one drug
- student and parent both agree to participate in the intervention study
- meets criteria for at least one DSM-IV substance dependence disorder
- meets criteria for a psychotic disorder or a learning disability
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description 1 brief intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy) One arm was a 2-session brief intervention with both sessions involving only the adolescent. Each session was a 60 minute individual session with the counselor. 2 brief intervention (cognitive-behavioral therapy) The other arm was a 3-session brief intervention, with 2 sessions involving the adolescent and one session with the parent. Each of these individual sessions were 60 minutes.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Drug use frequency and quantity at 1-, 3- and 12-months post-intervention. 1 year post treatment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method HIV and sexual risk behaviors at the same time period. 1 year post treatment
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Minnesota
🇺🇸Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States