A Comparison of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
- Conditions
- Coronary DiseaseCoronary Stenosis
- Registration Number
- NCT02100722
- Lead Sponsor
- Stanford University
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Fractional flow reserve (FFR, (coronary pressure wire-based index for assessing the ischemic potential of a coronary lesion)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) will result in similar outcomes to coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
- Detailed Description
The FAME 3 trial is a multicenter, international, randomized, controlled noninferiority trial. All patients with multivessel CAD (not involving the left main) will be screened by the site's Heart Team (including but not limited to an interventional cardiologist, cardiac surgeon and research coordinator). If all agree that the patient can be treated either with FFR-guided PCI or CABG, and all inclusion criteria are met and no exclusion criteria are met, then the patient will be randomized.
Baseline clinical, functional, laboratory and electrocardiographic data will be obtained. Patients will receive treatment within 4 weeks of randomization. Patients randomized to CABG will receive state of the art therapy at the discretion of the local surgeon with a strong emphasis on arterial revascularization. Patients undergoing PCI will have FFR measured with a St. Jude Medical coronary pressure wire across all lesions. If the FFR is ≤0.80, then PCI will be performed with the Medtronic Resolute Integrity drug-eluting stent (DES) as per usual routine. If the FFR is \>0.80 then PCI will be deferred.
All patients will receive medical therapy as per published guidelines. Patients will follow-up at 1 and 6 months, and 1 and 3 years with an evaluation of clinical status, functional status, medications and events. Follow-up may be extended to 5 years, if funding allows.
Core lab analyses will include formal quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) of the baseline angiograms with calculation of the Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score and Functional SYNTAX Score.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1500
-
- Age ≥ 21 years with angina and/or evidence of myocardial ischemia
-
- Three vessel CAD, defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis by visual estimation in each of the three major epicardial vessels or major side branches, but not involving left main coronary artery, and amenable to revascularization by both PCI and CABG as determined by the Heart Team. Patients with a non-dominant right coronary artery may be included if only the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex have ≥50% stenosis
-
- Willing and able to provide informed, written consent
-
- Requirement for other cardiac or non-cardiac surgical procedure (e.g., valve replacement, carotid revascularization)
-
- Cardiogenic shock and/or need for mechanical/pharmacologic hemodynamic support
-
- Recent STEMI (<5 days prior to randomization)
-
- Ongoing Non STEMI with biomarkers (cardiac troponin) still rising
-
- Known left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
-
- Life expectancy < 2 years
-
- Requiring renal replacement therapy
-
- Undergoing evaluation for organ transplantation
-
- Participation or planned participation in another clinical trial, except for observational registries
-
- Pregnancy
-
- Inability to take dual antiplatelet therapy for six months
-
- Previous CABG
-
- Left main disease requiring revascularization
-
- Extremely calcified or tortuous vessels precluding FFR measurement
-
- Any target lesion with in-stent drug-eluting stent restenosis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method MACCE 1 year Death, MI, stroke and any repeat revascularization (MACCE) will be evaluated at 1 year, where subjects contribute data from time of randomization until the occurrence of MACCE or one year follow-up, whichever occurs first. Subjects who die or are lost to follow up before 1 year will be censored at their last recorded activity.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants Experiencing Stroke 1 year Stroke evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm.
Key Secondary Outcome: Composite of Death From Any Cause, Myocardial Infarction, or Stroke 3 years Death, MI, or stroke at 3-year follow-up
Number of Participants Experiencing Definite Symptomatic Graft Occlusion 1 year Death 1 year Death evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm
Number of Participants Requiring Repeat Revascularization 1 year Any repeat revascularization evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm
Number of Participants Experiencing Death, MI, or Stroke 1 year Subjects who died or are lost to follow up before this time were censored at their last recorded activity.
Number of Participants Experiencing Myocardial Infarction 1 year MI evaluated excluding patients lost to follow-up from each arm
Number of Participants Experiencing BARC Type 3-5 Bleeding 1 year Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3-5 indicates severe bleeding.
Number of Participants Experiencing Atrial Fibrillation or Clinically Significant Arrhythmia 1 year Number of Participants Experiencing Definite Stent Thrombosis 1 year Number of Participants Requiring Rehospitalization Within 30 Days 30 days Individual Components of Primary Outcome At year 3 Individual components of primary outcome: number of participants experiencing death, myocardial infarction, and stroke
MACCE 2 years, 3 years, 5 years Death, MI, stroke and any repeat revascularization (MACCE) rate at 2 years, 3 years and 5 years
Death, MI, or Stroke at 5 Years 5 years Death, MI, or stroke at 5 years
Number of Participants Experiencing Acute Kidney Injury 1 year
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (46)
Palo Alto VA
🇺🇸Palo Alto, California, United States
Stanford University
🇺🇸Stanford, California, United States
Atlanta VA Medical Center
🇺🇸Decatur, Georgia, United States
Jesse Brown VA Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
🇺🇸Lawrence, Kansas, United States
Lexinton VA
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Kentucky Medical Center
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Baystate Medical Center
🇺🇸Springfield, Massachusetts, United States
HealthEast St. Joseph's Hospital
🇺🇸Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Scroll for more (36 remaining)Palo Alto VA🇺🇸Palo Alto, California, United States