跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05173935
NCT05173935已完成不适用

Complications Associated With Primary Placement of Radiologically-Inserted Gastrostomy Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for Feeding

Mayo Clinic2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 43 人开始时间: 2017年12月8日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
Mayo Clinic
入组人数
43
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in pain with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of the study is to compare pain, complications, and quality of life after gastrostomy tube is placed by either percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or radiologically-inserted gastrostomy (RIG) method.

详细描述

Objectives:

Primary objectives: to assess 1) pain and 2) major and minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG

Secondary objectives:

  • To compare costs associated with each technique
  • To compare anesthesia type used with each technique
  • To assess patient quality of life before and after the procedure

Co-primary outcome measures:

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Participants are randomized to receive either RIG or PEG. Investigator and Outcomes Assessors are masked.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Change in pain with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG

时间窗: Before the procedure, within 24 hours after procedure, at 48-96 hours after procedure, and at 6 weeks after procedure

Trajectory of the average pain score over time (question 3, Cleeland Brief Pain Inventory), which rates average pain in the past 24 hours, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain as bad as can be imagined

Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG

时间窗: At 9 months, if tube still in place

Assessment of the following complications after procedure: Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out, Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate

Major and minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG

时间窗: At 6 weeks after procedure

Assessment of the following major complications after procedure: Peritonitis, Abscess, Major bleeding requiring intervention and/or transfusion, Bowel perforation, Death; Assessment of the following minor complications after procedure: Minor bleeding, not requiring transfusion, Tube occluded, Tube malpositioned/fell out,Tube damaged, Skin erosion, Site redness, Site nodules/induration, Site exudate

次要结局

  • Anesthesia type associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG(Immediately after procedure completion)
  • Costs associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG(Immediately after procedure completion)
  • Patient quality of life associated with gastrostomy tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG, before and after the procedure(At 6 weeks after procedure)

研究者

发起方
Mayo Clinic
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Melissa J. Neisen

Principal Investigator

Mayo Clinic

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验