Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06364709
NCT06364709
Enrolling By Invitation
Not Applicable

Word Retrieval in Aphasia

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentOctober 15, 2024
ConditionsAphasia

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Aphasia
Sponsor
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Trained naming items
Status
Enrolling By Invitation
Last Updated
8 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Aphasia is a disorder of spoken and written language, most commonly following a stroke. It is estimated that between 2.5 and 4 million Americans are living with aphasia today. A common problem in aphasia involves difficulty retrieving known words in the course of language production and comprehension. The overarching goal of this project is to develop and test early efficacy, efficiency, and the tolerability of a lexical treatment for aphasia in multiple-session regimens that are comprised of retrieval practice, distributed practice, and training dedicated to the elicitation of correct retrievals. The aim of this work is to add to and refine the evidence base for the implementation and optimization of these elements in the treatment of production and comprehension deficits in aphasia, and make important steps towards an ultimate goal of self-administered lexical treatment grounded in retrieval practice principles (RPP) to supplement traditional speech-language therapy that is appropriate for People with Aphasia (PWA) from a broad level of severity of lexical processing deficit in naming and/or comprehension. This project cumulatively builds on prior work to develop a theory of learning for lexical processing impairment in aphasia that aims to ultimately explain why and for whom familiar lexical treatments work, and how to maximize the benefits they confer.

Detailed Description

This study examines a retrieval practice-based naming treatment termed criterion learning. In criterion learning, each item's assigned criterion level dictates the number of times that item is correctly retrieved before it is dropped from further training within a session. Criterion learning optimally incorporates potent learning experiences, including spaced retrieval practice with emphasis on correct retrievals during training. By examining scheduling and dosing parameters the present study will provide critical observations for optimizing criterion learning for treating word processing deficits in people with aphasia. This study will recruit 20 community-dwelling individuals with aphasia, who will undergo comprehensive neuropsychological characterization. Subsequently, participants will engage in an experimental treatment designed to promote improvements in word retrieval deficits. This study will examine naming mastery of personally-relevant, functional vocabulary for PWA as a function of per-item naming practice dosage (i.e., criterion-level) and number of training sessions. Each participant will take part in a multi-session naming treatment study requiring completion of five training sessions generally separated by one-week. A retention test of naming performance will be administered approximately one week following the final training session. The first trial per item in sessions following the initial session serves as a one-week test of retention of prior training. Analyses will identify the item-dosage and session-dosage that most efficiently confers the highest naming mastery of treated items at a one-week retention interval.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 15, 2024
End Date
August 1, 2028
Last Updated
8 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Erica Middleton

Institute Scientist, Jefferson Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute

Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • English as a native or primary language
  • Adults with stroke who are at least 6 months post-onset

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of comorbid neurological diagnoses, such as Multiple Sclerosis or Parkinson's Disease
  • History of a learning disability that significantly impacted language development, such as developmental language disorder
  • Insufficient stamina to participate in the protocol

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Trained naming items

Time Frame: during treatment

Confrontation naming task that involves trained items

Secondary Outcomes

  • Trained naming items(pre-treatment, approximately one-week following treatment)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials