A Study of Non-Steroidal or Opioid Analgesia Use for Children With Musculoskeletal Injuries: The No OUCH Trials

Rationale:

Multiple national and international organizations, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), have voiced concern over the emergency departments' (EDs) ability and willingness to provide appropriate analgesia for children's pain. Musculoskeletal (MSK) injury is a very common cause for ED visits for children with pain, with a child's risk of sustaining a fracture ranging from 27-42% by the age of 16 years. MSK injury is known to generate moderate to severe pain in most children and the ED serves as the critical entry point for these injured children. Despite three decades of pain research in this area, recent evidence confirms that ED pain management in children is still suboptimal. A retrospective cohort study of children presenting to the ED with an isolated long-bone fracture showed almost 1/3 received inadequate medication and 59% received no pain medications during the critical first hour of assessment. Previous studies have demonstrated that only 35% of children presenting to a Canadian pediatric ED with fractures or severe sprains received any analgesic. Further, a medical record review of two Canadian EDs showed unacceptably long delays in provision of initial analgesia, with children waiting a mean of 118 minutes to the provision of first analgesia.

The AAP's consensus statement on the assessment and management of pain in children recommends acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and opioids as the top three medication choices for the treatment of acute pain in children. These are also the top three most commonly used treatments in the ED for children with MSK injury pain. It stands to reason that clinicians (and certainly patients and their families) would prefer medication that has the best efficacy and safety profile. Although not based on robust evidence, there has recently been a concerted movement to limit opioid use in children. This is due, in part, to recent controversial publications and the Centre for Disease Control (CDC)'s position statement regarding opioid use in adults. Clinicians are increasingly less likely to prescribe oral opioids to younger children, and caregivers are increasingly less willing to accept or administer them.

Clinicians are currently seeking effective (and for many, non-opioid) oral analgesic options for their pediatric patients. Researchers have yet to identify the optimal acute pain management strategy for children with a suspected fracture, as very few studies of analgesic combination therapy for this injury exist, and monotherapy has been shown to be inadequate 50% of the time. This team's previous work has demonstrated that a combination of oral morphine with ibuprofen was no more effective and was less safe than oral ibuprofen, alone, for suspected fracture pain. Similarly, oxycodone was no more effective and was less safe than ibuprofen for post-discharge fracture pain. There is some emerging work from non-ED settings to suggest that oral hydromorphone may be an effective alternative to these two opioid medications. The investigators wish to study if acetaminophen or hydromorphone, when added to ibuprofen, offers more clinical pain relief than ibuprofen alone. They also wish to study if the combination of hydromorphone and ibuprofen is more clinically effective than the combination of acetaminophen with ibuprofen. This study, which will consist of two clinical trials, will inform health-care decisions by providing evidence for the effectiveness and safety of commonly prescribed analgesic combination therapies, and compare them to the most commonly used monotherapy, ibuprofen.

Methods: