MedPath

C-MAC Video Stylet vs. Video Endoscope

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Intubation
Interventions
Device: Video Endoscope
Device: C- MAC VS
Registration Number
NCT03749837
Lead Sponsor
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare first attempt success rates and time until intubation to establish the learning curves of the participating anaesthesiologists with two different intubation strategies: (Karl Storz C-MAC VS (Video Stylet) and the standard flexible intubation video endoscope at the study site.

Detailed Description

The intubation of the trachea is a crucial procedure in anaesthesia and emergency medicine, therefore it is considered as one of the core competences in these disciplines. Novices in the field need to learn intubation fast and without harming patients to ensure a patent airway if needed.

According to the European Union of Medical Specialists (U.E.M.S., 1050 Brussels, BE), every anaesthesiologist has to master different techniques for the airway management. One is the fiberoptic intubation in awake or asleep patients, to manage a difficult airway. For further training, these core competences need to be extended during the career, from level A (has knowledge) to level D (teaches or supervises others). As the intubation with flexible fiberoptic scopes is the gold standard for the management of a known difficult airway, the investigators want to compare this to a new technique. The use of flexible scopes do not guarantee easy intubation in every difficult airway situation and intubation sometimes is difficult to achieve and requires high proficiency (unability to steer, unability to overcome an anatomical obstacle). Various approaches were introduced by the medical device industry to overcome that problem. One new device is a rigid video stylet with a flexible tip (Karl Storz C-MAC VS), which is an advancement of the older rigid scope "Bonfils" (Karl Storz).

Intubation training with the Bonfils stylet has been shown to require about 20 consecutive tracheal intubations by novices to reach expert time. Learning curves for fiberoptic intubations seem to be similar, but a greater variance was observed. A study of the investigators research-group (unpublished data, KEK 247/09), comparing learning curves between the rigid fiberoptic Bonfils and the semi-rigid fiberoptic SensaScope suggested a 90% success rate for intubation within 60 seconds after about 15 trials (Bonfils) and 20 trials (SensaScope). In comparison, there is no validated data for the use of rigid scopes with flexible tips, as these tool are very new.

Video stylets are tools originally designed for difficult airway management as well. The C-MAC VS combines rigid and semi-rigid abilities. Intubation seems to become very easy. But yet, there is no data available which proves that assumption. Thus the study wants to evaluate if intubation success and time is superior with the C-MAC Video Scope compared to the difficult intubation gold standard, the intubation with a standard flexible fiberoptic scope.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria
  • Anaesthesiologists starting in the respective anaesthesia department who are not experienced with tracheal intubation with the study devices
  • Informed Consent as documented by signature (Appendix Informed Consent Form)
  • Novice to the C-MAC VS
  • No/few fiberoptic oral asleep intubation experience (max. 5x during the last year)
Exclusion Criteria
  • More than 5 uses during the past year of either one of the study devices
  • Not available at the study site during entire study (expected drop outs)
  • Not able to fill out English case reports
  • Patients: Planned delayed extubation (e.g. planned transfer to ICU)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Video EndoscopeVideo EndoscopeIntubation with standard fiberoptic scope
C- MAC VSC- MAC VSIntubation with C- MAC VS
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time (seconds) to successful orotracheal intubation during the first successful attempt.Start: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (a trial consists of a maximum of 2 intubation attempts, each with a maximum duration of 120 seconds)

With the C-MAC VS and the standard flexible scope

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of intubation attemptsStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

End of an attempt defined as: device has to be completely removed out of the patient's airway.

Subjective difficulty of the intubation procedureStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds

The VAS- Visual analogue scale (score 1-10) is used. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics that cannot be directly measured. Therefore numbers are used to evaluate.

Patients vital parameter such as heart rate, during the intubation attemptStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

The investigators will use the standard non-invasive monitoring of the University Hospital to measure the heart rate.

Overall time from startpoint to glottic viewIt cannot be longer than 240 seconds and is defined for unsuccessful trials, i.e. if no intubation was established, as 360 seconds.

The overall time is defined as the total time to glottic view, summarized over all attempts.

Cormack/Lehane gradeStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

The Cormack/Lehane grade is used to describe the laryngeal view during laryngoscopy. It is rated by the supervisor.

Patients demographic data such as ageDuring the process of screening, up to 24 hours before the study session starts

The age of each patient will be presented in years.

Time to first end expiratory CO2 readingStart: Device passes patients lips; End: First end expiratory CO2 reading (trial in total not >240 seconds)

After the airway is secured the first end expiratory CO2 is shown.The investigators will use the standard non-invasive monitoring of the University Hospital to measure the end expiratory CO2

Correlation to patients' anatomical characteristicsStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

To assess the influence of difficulty with the airway

Participants characteristics and demographic dataBefore the study session starts (up to 24 hours before the first intubation attempt)

Basic demographic data (including years of experience in anaesthesia).

Patients demographic data such as weightDuring the process of screening, up to 24 hours before the study session starts

The weight of each patient will be presented in kilograms

Limited or restricted vision through the devices (either C MAC VS or a standard flexible scope)Start: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

The view can be clear or blurred.

Patients vital parameter such as blood pressure, during the intubation attemptStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

The investigators will use the standard non-invasive monitoring of the University Hospital to measure the blood pressure (in millimeters of mercury)

Patients vital parameter such as oxygen saturation, during the intubation attemptStart: Device passes patients lips; End: Device is completely removed out of the tracheal tube (trial in total not >240 seconds)

The investigators will use the standard non-invasive monitoring of the University Hospital to measure the oxygen saturation (SpO2 in percent).

Patients demographic data such as ASA risc classification (ASA= American Society of Anaesthesiologists)During the process of screening, up to 24 hours before the study session starts

The ASA grading system is used to evaluate the degree of a patient's physical state before selecting the anesthetic or before performing surgery.

Patients demographic data such as heightDuring the process of screening, up to 24 hours before the study session starts

The size of each patient will be presented in meter/centimeter

Patients demographic data such as genderDuring the process of screening, up to 24 hours before the study session starts

The gender of each patient will be presented in female or male.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Inselspital, Bern University Hospital

šŸ‡ØšŸ‡­

Bern, Switzerland

LHSC / St. Joesephs

šŸ‡ØšŸ‡¦

London, Ontario, Canada

Miguel Servet University Hospital

šŸ‡ŖšŸ‡ø

Zaragoza, Spain

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath