Biomechanical Determinants of Different Rehabilitation Protocols for ACL Reconstruction
Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Knee InjuriesRehabilitation
- Registration Number
- NCT05733936
- Lead Sponsor
- Delta University for Science and Technology
- Brief Summary
Purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of the criterion rehabilitation protocol versus accelerated rehabilitation protocol on the biomechanical determinants of the quality of performance and risk of reinjury.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 105
Inclusion Criteria
- Amateur male athletes who underwent ACLR surgery with an autologous hamstring (HS) graft.
- Ranging in age from 18 to 35 years.
- Underwent a pre-operative rehabilitation program with minimal knee effusion, full Extension, good patellofemoral mobility
- Ability to actively control the quadriceps.
Exclusion Criteria
- ACLR with any graft other than a hamstring graft
- ACL revision surgery
- associated medial or lateral ligamentous injuries
- previous meniscectomy or meniscal repair
- simultaneous meniscectomy or meniscus repair with the ACLR
- cartilage damage.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lateral trunk flexion during Single leg landing-jump test using CLINICAL CLIMA 3DMA 15 minutes From the coronal plane, trunk lateral flexion angle is the angle of the trunk
Dynamic knee valgus during Single leg landing-jump test using CLINICAL CLIMA 3DMA 15 minutes From the coronal plane, dynamic knee valgus is the angle of the knee
knee flexion angle during Single leg landing-jump test using CLINICAL CLIMA 3DMA 15 minutes From sagittal plane, knee flexion angle is the angle of the knee
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Delta university
🇪🇬Gamasa, Eldakahlyia, Egypt
Delta university🇪🇬Gamasa, Eldakahlyia, Egypt