Assessment of Visual Dyslexia Remediation Protocols - Dyslexia REMEDIATION
- Conditions
- Dyslexia
- Interventions
- Behavioral: visual stimulation with lampBehavioral: visual stimulation with I pad
- Registration Number
- NCT05514457
- Lead Sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Brief Summary
Dyslexia is first described as a phonological deficit. Several studies report a neurovisual deficit in dyslexics. Some dyslexics have a visual deficit without phonological impairment, others have a pure phonological deficit, and still others have both types of deficits. From this observation the idea emerged to propose specific remediation protocols for people with visual impairments and to assess their effects on reading. At the theoretical level, if visual stimulation is able to improve reading performance, it is the demonstration of the existence of visual origin of dyslexia. At the clinical level, such a result not only opens the prospect of a different and more adapted rehabilitation for these types of dyslexia, but also the prospect, if the visual deficits are pre-existing to the learning of reading, to use them for early diagnosis and management.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 64
- Male or female
- Aged 8 to 12
- Diagnosed dyslexics
- Normal or corrected to normal vision
- Legal guardians of children subjects providing their free, informed and written consent to participate in the study; With the child also giving orally his consent to participate.
- other neurodevelopmental problem
- strabismus, amblyopia
For the glasses (group 2) : epileptic child are excluded
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description remediation group 2 visual stimulation with lamp dyslexic children remediation group 1 visual stimulation with I pad dyslexic children
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method reading performance for arm 1: at baseline at 1 month at 2 month at 3 month For arm 2: 4 times in the same day, 4 consecutive reading sessions with a break in-between of minimum 5 minutes change in number of errors
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method performance score on the phonology tests (EVALéo 6-15 = Evaluation of written language and oral language 6-15 years) one time at baseline metaphonology = removal of phonemes. Minimum score = 0 and maximum (better) score = 20
score of Elementary Visuo-Spatial Perception test one time at baseline comparisons of score of (lengths, sizes, angles and relative positions within and between objects). Minimum score = 36 and maximum (better) score = 72
visual attention span one time at baseline number of letters identified in a single ocular fixation (200 ms)
Visual search time one time at baseline average visual search time of symbols versus colored objects
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon
🇫🇷Bron, Rhone Alpes, France