Addressing Unfunded Vaccines Through a Co-payment Mechanism in Pharmacies
- Conditions
- Preventable Disease, Vaccine
- Interventions
- Other: Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 1Other: Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 2Other: Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 4Other: Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 3
- Registration Number
- NCT06489964
- Lead Sponsor
- Canadian Immunization Research Network
- Brief Summary
The goal of this pilot demonstration and evaluation project is to increase the accessibility and uptake of recommended immunizations in the general public by implementing a transitional stepped co-payment model in community pharmacies in Nova Scotia and Ontario for the delivery of recommended but unfunded vaccines until full public funding is available. The main question it aims to answer is:
* Can a transitional stepped co-payment model through pharmacies for the delivery of recommended but unfunded vaccines (e.g., Shingrix, FluMist) increase the accessibility and uptake of recommended immunizations among various stakeholders until full public funding is available?
Participants will:
* Receive a reduced cost of the vaccine (if eligible) through this transitional stepped co-payment funding model, as part of routine care (following standard pharmacy practice).
* Complete a feedback and satisfaction survey exploring their thoughts on the transitional stepped co-payment model, their satisfaction with the co-payment model, their perception on vaccinations in general and specifically about recommended but unfunded vaccines, and their demographics (such as gender, age, education, race/ethnicity).
- Detailed Description
While the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides vaccine recommendations, it is the responsibility of provinces and territories in Canada to decide which vaccine programs they will support and implement publicly. Some vaccines recommended by NACI are not publicly funded in Canada and require out-of-pocket pay or private health insurance plans. This lack of public funding may be a factor contributing to low vaccine uptake. Cost-related barriers are also important concerns among prescribers who tend to be hesitant in recommending vaccines that are not publicly funded due to issues with patient affordability. Pharmacy professionals across Canada are increasingly taking a dominant role in administering certain publicly funded vaccines such as influenza and COVID-19, but administration of other publicly funded immunizations have been limited in many jurisdictions, and pharmacy services providing unfunded vaccines are underutilized.
Publicly funded immunization programs have demonstrated their cost-effectiveness for the healthcare system; however, evaluating the economic impact of introducing new vaccines into these programs is a time-consuming process, resulting in delays in making them available for public funding. The significant upfront costs of introducing a new vaccine program can be financially prohibitive, acting as a major barrier to having vaccinations covered through public funding. As a result, introducing a co-payment system for recommended but unfunded vaccines may help mitigate the perception that these vaccines are of lesser importance, especially if the government is covering a portion of the vaccine and administration fees. A flexible transitional stepped co-payment model, where the costs are shared between the patient or their private insurance and the government, until full funding becomes available, could potentially offer a solution to enhance immunization rates for these vaccines.
In this Pilot Demonstration and Evaluation Project, the investigators propose to better understand potential solutions to cost-related barriers that limit uptake of recommended but unfunded vaccines. Implementation of a transitional stepped co-payment funding model within community pharmacies will be piloted at select community pharmacies in Nova Scotia and Ontario where pharmacists will prescribe and administer recommended but unfunded vaccines. Electronic surveys will assess public and provider satisfaction with the model and vaccination rates before and after implementation will be compared.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 600
- The selection of the community pharmacies will be based on population size, stable pharmacy patients, availability and interest of community pharmacies and community pharmacy professionals, sufficient numbers of pharmacy professionals qualified to provide vaccinations, and lack of substantial health care spill over to adjacent communities.
- Spill over is defined as a pattern of health-care utilization where patients regularly receive care at different regional health centres. Communities will be geographically separated to minimize potential spill over.
- The selection of the community pharmacy sites is still in progress. We will aim to recruit pharmacies in different locations around the province(s) and ensure the locations are comparable in terms of socioeconomic status and separated sufficiently to reduce shopping around for the best deal.
- The participating pilot pharmacies will recruit individuals who are currently eligible for the vaccine as per NACI guidance for each product as part of routine care.
- Patients of the participating pharmacies in Nova Scotia and Ontario who already have private insurance coverage to cover all (or most) of the vaccine will be excluded from taking part in this pilot project.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Community Pharmacy Sites (Step 1) Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 1 A pharmacy site in Nova Scotia and Ontario will be assigned to pilot Step 1 of the transitional co-payment model for the duration of the pilot study. Community Pharmacy Sites (Step 2) Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 2 A pharmacy site in Nova Scotia and Ontario will be assigned to pilot Step 2 of the transitional co-payment model for the duration of the pilot study. Community Pharmacy Sites (Step 4) Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 4 A pharmacy site in Nova Scotia and Ontario will be assigned to pilot Step 4 of the transitional co-payment model for the duration of the pilot study. Community Pharmacy Sites (Step 3) Transitional Stepped Co-payment Model - Step 3 A pharmacy site in Nova Scotia and Ontario will be assigned to pilot Step 3 of the transitional co-payment model for the duration of the pilot study.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluating Acceptability of Implementing of a Transitional Stepped Co-Payment Model within Community Pharmacies through Surveys with Members of the Public and Community Pharmacists 6 months After receiving a reduced cost in a vaccine as part of the transitional stepped co-payment model, participants will be asked to complete a survey about their participation in the co-payment model. At the end of the pilot study, pharmacists who take part in the study will be asked to complete a survey about implementing the co-payment model within their pharmacy practice. The surveys will be developed based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability and include questions on the acceptability of the co-payment model. To evaluate acceptability of implementing a co-payment model within community pharmacies, data from the public and pharmacist surveys will be analyzed using basic descriptive statistics. Factors that may influence acceptability of the transitional stepped co-payment model (e.g. geography, gender, age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and cost) will also be assessed, especially given that the acceptability with the co-payment model may vary by these demographic factors.
Evaluating Feasibility of Implementing a Transitional Stepped Co-Payment Model within Community Pharmacies through Surveys with Members of the Public and Community Pharmacists 6 months After receiving a reduced cost in a vaccine as part of the transitional stepped co-payment model, participants will be asked to complete a survey about their participation in the co-payment model. At the end of the pilot study, pharmacists who take part in the study will be asked to complete a survey about implementing the co-payment model within their pharmacy practice. The surveys will be developed based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and include questions regarding the feasibility of the co-payment model. To evaluate the feasibility of implementing a transitional stepped co-payment model within community pharmacies, data from the public and pharmacist surveys will be analyzed using basic descriptive statistics. Factors that may influence feasibility of the transitional stepped co-payment model such as geography (urban vs. rural), gender, age, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and cost to the patient will also be assessed.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of vaccines administered at participating community pharmacy sites 30 months To compare vaccine uptake using pharmacy-generated reports of the number of vaccines administered at participating community pharmacies before (from September 2023 to August 2024), during (from September 2024 to March 2025), and after (from April 2025 to March 2026) implementation of the alternative funding models.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Dalhousie University
🇨🇦Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada