Equivalence of A Stable Liquid Glucagon Formulation With Freshly Reconstituted Lyophilized Glucagon
- Registration Number
- NCT02018627
- Lead Sponsor
- Steven J. Russell, MD, PhD
- Brief Summary
This study will test the hypothesis that micro-doses of Xerisol Glucagon (Xeris Pharmaceuticals) will be non-inferior by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria vs. micro-doses of Glucagon for Injection (Eli Lilly).
- Detailed Description
This study will test the hypothesis that micro-doses of a new formulation of stable glucagon, Xerisol Glucagon (Xeris Pharmaceuticals), will be non-inferior by pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic criteria vs. micro-doses of a freshly reconstituted formulation of glucagon that has poor stability in solution, Glucagon for Injection (Eli Lilly).
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- Age 21 to 80 years old with type 1 diabetes for at least one year.
- Diabetes managed using an insulin infusion pump using rapid-acting insulin such as insulin aspart (NovoLog), insulin lispro (Humalog), and insulin glulisine (Apidra) for at least one week prior to enrollment.
- Unable to provide informed consent.
- Unable to comply with study procedures.
- Current participation in another diabetes-related clinical trial that, in the judgment of the principle investigator, will compromise the results of the clamp study or the safety of the subject.
- Pregnancy (positive urine HCG), breast feeding, plan to become pregnant in the immediate future, or sexually active without use of contraception.
- End stage renal disease on dialysis (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis).
- Hemoglobin < 11.5 gm/dl.
- History of pheochromocytoma. Fractionated metanephrines will be tested in patients with history increasing the risk for a catecholamine secreting tumor (paroxysms of tachycardia, pallor, or headache; personal or family history of MEN 2A, MEN 2B, neurofibromatosis, or von Hippel-Lindau disease; episodic or treatment of refractory hypertension, defined as requiring 4 or more medications to achieve normotension).
- History of adverse reaction to glucagon (including allergy) besides nausea, vomiting, or headache.
- Inadequate venous access as determined by study nurse or physician at time of screening.
- Liver failure or cirrhosis.
- Any other factors that, in the judgment of the principal investigator, would interfere with the safe completion of the study procedures.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Xeris glucagon Xeris glucagon Xeris glucagon 50 micrograms, subcutaneous injection Lilly glucagon Lilly glucagon Lilly glucagon 30 micrograms, subcutaneous injection
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Tmax every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon tmax for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method GIRmin every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon Minimal glucose infusion rate (GIRmin) for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
Injection Pain immediately after injection Quantitation of adverse events related to glucagon injection for Xeris vs. Lilly:
-average Injection pain on a 10 cm standard VAS: 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain reported immediately after injection of glucagonMaximal Nausea within 1 hour of injection Quantitation of adverse events related to glucagon injection for Xeris vs. Lilly:
-Maximal nausea within 1 hour of injection on a 10 cm VAS: no nausea = 0, vomiting = 10AOCGIR every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon Area over the curve for glucose infusion rate in the hour following administration (AOCGIR) for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
t½Max every 2 minutes for 1 hour post-dose of each glucagon Glucagon t½max for Xeris vs. Lilly (non-inferiority)
Injection Site Erythema within 1 hour of injection Quantitation of adverse events related to glucagon injection for Xeris vs. Lilly:
-Injection site erythema or other local reaction, maximum diameter within 1 hour of injectionDermal Response (Draize Scale Grade for Edema Formation) within 1 hour of injection Average grade on the edema formation portion of the Draize scale for dermal response (0 being the lowest, 4 being the highest)
Dermal Response (Draize Scale for Erythema and Eschar Formation) within 1 hour of injection Average grade on the erythema and eschar formation portion of the Draize scale for dermal response (0 being the lowest, 4 being the highest)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Massachusetts General Hospital
🇺🇸Boston, Massachusetts, United States