Efficacy of Pilocarpine As a Secretagogue Versus Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye
- Conditions
- Dry Eye Disease (DED)
- Interventions
- Drug: artificial tears
- Registration Number
- NCT06752278
- Lead Sponsor
- Al-Azhar University
- Brief Summary
Management approaches for dry eye disease (DED) typically start with low-risk, easily accessible, patient-applied therapies like artificial tears for early-stage disease. As the condition worsens, treatment progresses to more advanced therapies for severe forms of DED. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of pilocarpine as a secretagogue versus artificial tears in the treatment of dry eye disease. Our goal is to provide reliable, high-quality evidence regarding the efficacy of secretagogues, thereby contributing to the development of recommendations that aid clinicians in their decision-making process
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- Patients diagnosed with DED
- Previous Occular surgery.
- Refuse to particupate.
- Patients with sjogren syndrome
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description pilocarpine group Pilocarpine - artificial tears group artificial tears -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ocular Surface Disease Index At the baseline and after 6 weeks tear film break-up time At the baseline and after 6 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Al-Azhar university
🇪🇬Damietta, Egypt