MedPath

Efficacy of Pilocarpine As a Secretagogue Versus Artificial Tears for the Treatment of Dry Eye

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Dry Eye Disease (DED)
Interventions
Drug: artificial tears
Registration Number
NCT06752278
Lead Sponsor
Al-Azhar University
Brief Summary

Management approaches for dry eye disease (DED) typically start with low-risk, easily accessible, patient-applied therapies like artificial tears for early-stage disease. As the condition worsens, treatment progresses to more advanced therapies for severe forms of DED. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of pilocarpine as a secretagogue versus artificial tears in the treatment of dry eye disease. Our goal is to provide reliable, high-quality evidence regarding the efficacy of secretagogues, thereby contributing to the development of recommendations that aid clinicians in their decision-making process

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients diagnosed with DED
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous Occular surgery.
  • Refuse to particupate.
  • Patients with sjogren syndrome

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
pilocarpine groupPilocarpine-
artificial tears groupartificial tears-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Ocular Surface Disease IndexAt the baseline and after 6 weeks
tear film break-up timeAt the baseline and after 6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Al-Azhar university

🇪🇬

Damietta, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath