MedPath

The Effect of MTA and PRF Application in Periapical Lesions

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Wound Heal
Apical Periodontitis
Interventions
Procedure: MTA group
Procedure: control group
Procedure: PRF group
Procedure: MTA + PRF group
Registration Number
NCT03743987
Lead Sponsor
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital
Brief Summary

A total of 40 periapical lesions from the 33 patient undergoing apical surgery were randomly selected from December 2016-November 2017. Patients were informed about the surgical procedure and signed a consent form. Groups were divided in to 4; as control, MTA (mineral trioxide aggregate), PRF (platelet rich fibrin) and MTA+PRF groups. Apical resection was performed in all groups. No other interventions were made to the control group.

Routine radiographs were taken in the 1st. 3th and 6th months. In the (approximately) 12th month of the procedures computerized tomography scans were taken. Primary healing of the periapical tissues were evaluated and the outcomes were measured. Patients have still been under control for the long term outcomes of the study.

Detailed Description

44 apically infected periapical lesions were decided to enroll to the study from December 2016-November 2017. However; a total of 40 periapical lesions undergoing apical surgery were recruited for the planned clinical trial in the end. The study was conducted under randomized controlled protocol. Patients were informed about the surgical procedures and signed a consent form. The anticipated outcomes, possible risks and benefits of the study as well as the alternative treatment options were explained to the patients.

Groups were designed to have 10 patients in each and randomly divided into four as; control, MTA, PRF and MTA+PRF. Apical resection was performed in all groups. No other interventions were made to the control group.

Routine radiographs were taken in the 1st. 3th and 6th months. In the 12th month of the procedures computerized tomography (CT) scans were taken. Primary healing of the periapical tissues were evaluated according to the volumes and the densities of the lesions. Outcomes were measured. Comparison between the initial and the last 3D CT scan volumes were made by medical image processing software (MIMICS, Belgium). Patients have still been under control for the long term outcomes of the study.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Single rooted canals
  • Failed previous root canal treatment
  • Retreatment at least 1 year previously
  • Previous surgery with unresolved bony lesion
Exclusion Criteria
  • More than single rooted canals
  • Chronic generalized periodontitis
  • Any systemic disease contraindicating oral surgical procedures
  • Evidence of root fracture
  • Resorptive processes involving more than apical third of the root

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MTA groupMTA groupRoot resection was applied and MTA was inserted through the apical foramen
control groupcontrol groupApical resection group. Only root resection was applied without any other interventions (like prf or mta)
PRF groupPRF groupRoot resection was applied and PRF was placed to the surgically prepared area
MTA + PRF groupMTA + PRF groupRoot resection was applied. MTA was inserted through the apical foramen and PRF was placed to the surgically prepared area
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radiographic success - in volume1 year

Evaluation of tomographic outcomes (differences between preoperative and postoperative volume of periapical lesions)

Radiographic success - in density1 year

Evaluation of tomographic outcomes (differences between preoperative and postoperative density of periapical lesions)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Nazife Begüm KARAN

🇹🇷

Ankara, Merkez, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath