跳至主要内容
临床试验/IRCT2016010425846N1
IRCT2016010425846N1已完成未知

The Effect of Peer Educational Program on Multiple Sclerosis Patient’s Self- Efficacy

Hamadan University of Medical Sciences0 个研究点目标入组 80 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
未知
状态
已完成
入组人数
80

研究概览

简要总结

  1. Brunner LS, Smeltzer SCC, Bare BG, Hinkle JL, Cheever KH. Brunner & Suddarth's textbook of medical-surgical nursing: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
    2. Thöne J, Gold R. Laquinimod: a promising oral medication for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology. 2011;7(3):365-70.
    3. Mohammad Khavasi, Daryadokht Masroor, Shokoh Varai, Koroush Joudaki, Masoud Rezaei, Babak Rastegari Mehr, et al. The Effect of Peer Education on Diabetes Self-Efficacy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Knowledge & Health. 2016;11(2). (persian)
    4. Bhise V, Dhib-Jalbut S. Further Understanding of the Immunopathology of Multiple Sclerosis: Impact on Future Treatments. Expert review of clinical immunology. 2016(just-accepted).
    5. Milo R, Kahana E. Multiple sclerosis: geoepidemiology, genetics and the environment. Autoimmunity reviews. 2010;9(5):A387-A94.
    6. Mohammad K, Rimaz S, Dastoorpour M, Sadeghi M, Majdzadeh SR. Quality of Life and Related Factors among multiple sclerosis patients. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2014;11(4):1-14.(persian)
    7. Kikuchi H, Mifune N, Niino M, Ohbu S, Kira J-i, Kohriyama T, et al. Impact and characteristics of quality of life in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis. Quality of life research. 2011;20(1):119-31.
    8. Hartung H-P, Matthews V, Perrin Ross A, group M-Ns. Disparities in nursing of multiple sclerosis patients–results of a European nurse survey. Eur Neurol Re. 2011:6(2): 97-106.
    9. Buchanan RJ, Johnson O, Zuniga MA, Carrillo-Zuniga G, Chakravorty BJ. Health-related quality of life among Latinos with multiple sclerosis. Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation. 2012;11(4):240-57.
    10. Christens BD, Speer PW, Peterson NA. Social class as moderator of the relationship between (dis) empowering processes and psychological empowerment. Journal of Community Psychology. 2011;39(2):170-82.
    11. Masoodi R, Alhani F, Rabiei L, Majdinasab N, Moghaddasi J, 2013 ES. The effect of Family-Centered empowerment model on quality of life and self efficacy of multiple scelerosis patients family care givers. Health magazine. 2013;4(2):147-55.(persian)
    12. Ferla J, Valcke M, Cai Y. Academic self-efficacy and academic self-concept: Reconsidering structural relationships. Learning and Individual Differences. 2009;19(4):499-505.
    13. Thornberg R, Jungert T. Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence. 2013;36(3):475-83.
    14. Maloni HW. Multiple sclerosis: Managing patients in primary care. The Nurse Practitioner. 2013;38(4):24-35.
    15. Borzou R, Bayat Z, Salvati M, Homayounfar S. A comparison of Individual and Peer Educational Methods on Quality of life in patients with heart failure. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2014;14(9):767-76.(persian)
    16. Varaei S, Shamsizadeh M, Cheraghi MA, Talebi M, Dehghani A, Abbasi A. Effects of a peer education on cardiac self-efficacy and readmissions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized-controlled trial. Nursing in critical care. 2014.
    17. Dehghani A, Mohammadkhan Kermanshahi S, Memarian R, Baharlou R. The Effect of Peer Group Education on Anxiety of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Iranian Journal of Medical Education; 2012:12(4): 249-257.(persian)
    18. salmani R, Sehati shfahi F, Alizadeh S, Ebrahimi M. Effect of Peer Education on knowledge and practice about iron deficiency and iron supplementationfemale students in secondary school in the city of Tabriz Tabriz univercity medical scienses congress. 2010.(persian)
    19. Dehghani A, Kermanshahi S, Memarian R, Hojjati H. The effect of peer-led education on depression of multiple sclerosis patients. Iranian Journal of psychiatric nursing. 2013;1(1):63-71.(persian)
    20. Jadid Milani M, Ashktorab T, Abed Saeedi Z, Alavi Majd H. Effect of Peer Support Groups on promotion of Physical Health Status in Multiple Sclerosis: Testing Reed’s Self-Transcendence Theory. Health promotion management. 2012;1(1):30-40. (persian)
    21. Garfein RS, Golub ET, Greenberg AE, Hagan H, Hanson DL, Hudson SM, et al. A peer-education intervention to reduce injection risk behaviors for HIV and hepatitis C virus infection in young injection drug users. Aids. 2007;21(14):1923-32.
    22. sharif F, Abshorshori N, Hazrati M, Tahmasebi S, Zare N. The effect of peer education on quality of life in patients with breast cancer after surgery. Payesh journal. 2011;11(5):703-10.(persian)
    23. Varaei S, Cheraghi M, Seyedfatemi N, Talebi M, Bahrani N, Dehghani A, et al. Effect of peer education on anxiety in patients candidated for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized control trial. Journal of Nursing Education. 2013;2(3):28-37.(persian)

    The effect of peer educational program on multiple sclerosis patient’s self- efficacy
    Abstrac:
    Introduction: Multiple Sclerosis threatens independence and ability of person to effectively participate in the family and society . The purpose of this study was determined The effect of peer educational program on multiple sclerosis patient’s self- efficacy referred to Farshchian hospital and Multiple Sclerosis Association in Hamadan in City 2015.
    Method: In this quasi-experimental study, 80 Patients with Multiple Sclerosis was selected with random available sampling sampling and randomly were divided to control and case groups. 4 sessions, each for 60 minutes, twice a week was performed for groups. After one month after the last training session, self-questionnaires were completed by both experimental and control groups. data were collected from both groups with Shere General Self-Efficacy Questionnaire . Data were analyzed with SPSS software (16 version) by descriptive statistics, independed-t, paired-t.
    Results: in case group. There was a significant difference between the mean scores of Self-efficacy. The difference was not significant in the control group. There were no significant differences between the mean scores of Self-efficacy of case and control group before and after intervention .
    Conclusion: Peer education methods could increase the level of efficacy in patients with multiple sclerosis. This method can be used as a valuable tool to improve the treatment and control of physical and psychological effects and increase the efficacy of the patients' disease.
    Key words: peer education, self- efficacy, multiple sclerosis

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 years 至 50 years(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Criteria for inclusion: patients with multiple sclerosis; age 18-50? approved by the Board of patients; lack of experience in training classes during the past six months; lack of physical mental or psychological disorders such as acute or chronic severe depression; lack of speech or hearing impaired; Independent of the wheelchair; being in the acute phase Peer group inclusion criteria:get higher than 65 score from self-efficacy questionnaire; interested in membership in the peer group Exclusion criteria: the lack of consent to the study; absence of more than 2 sessions in the classroom; relapse

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究者

相似试验