跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04166162
NCT04166162已完成不适用

Businesses That Care - Zacatecas

University of Miami1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 555 人开始时间: 2019年11月4日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
555
试验地点
1
主要终点
Change in risk behaviors in TBD Intervention Recipients

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a community-based prevention initiative to prevent youth alcohol use and abuse in Zacatecas, Mexico.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
8 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Change in risk behaviors in TBD Intervention Recipients

时间窗: Baseline, 6 weeks

The efficacy of the TBD intervention is assessed via the changes in targeted risk and protective measures on the pre and post TBD survey. Risk factor measures with multiple items is scored by taking the average of all items in the scale. Lower scores are indicative of less risk and of positive effects of the intervention. The average scores are: minimum =1 and maximum = 4.

Sustainability of BTC coalition

时间窗: 1 year

Sustainability of the BTC coalition is assessed via the number of coalition members that continues the implementation of the BTC prevention program one year after BTC training.

Change in risk behaviors in SDS Intervention Recipients

时间窗: Pre-SDS Intervention, Post-SDS Intervention (2 hours)

The efficacy of the SDS intervention is assessed via the SDS survey. The SDS survey is coded and scored by taking the average of all items in the scale. The higher scores are indicative of greater use of the SDS as an intervention strategy. The average scores are: minimum =1 and maximum = 4.

Change in risk behaviors in BIMI Intervention Recipients

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months

The efficacy of the BIMI intervention is assessed via the Care, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) survey. The CRAFFT survey consist of 8 questions answered with "yes" or "no". Each No response is scored 0 and each Yes response is scored 1. The total score ranges from 0-8 with the lower score indicating increased positive response to BIMI intervention.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Eric Brown

Associate Professor

University of Miami

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验