Comparative study of between three methods of ovulation stimulation in outcome of poor responders in ART
- Conditions
- Infertility.Female infertility
- Registration Number
- IRCT20110908007513N17
- Lead Sponsor
- Esfahan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 150
Individuals with poor ovarian response in the ovulation stimulation cycle are characterized by the POSEIDON criterion. Groups 3 and 4 are entered.The third group of patients are under 35 years with abnormal ovarian reserve test AFC (number of antral follicles) less than 5 and antimullerian hormone less than 1.2 ng / cc. The fourth group of patients are over 35 years with abnormal ovarian reserve test AFC less than 5 And antimullerian hormone less than 1.2 ng / cc
Patients who are infected with the coronavirus during the cycle, patients who do not respond well to the ovulation stimulation cycle and do not actually have a follicle to empty, patients who received drug incorrectly during the cycle.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of the average number of oocytes obtained and the rate of chemical pregnancy, frequency of IMPLANTATION, frequency of CILINICAL PREGNANCY, frequency of ONGOING PREGNANCY is studied in three groups. Timepoint: The time of oocyte count: after ovuum pickup, the time of positive pregnancy test: 2 weeks after embryo transfer, the time of pregnancy sac: 4 weeks after embryo transfer and the time of ongoing pregnancy rate: in 12 weeks of pregnancy. Method of measurement: Evaluation of oocyte count after ovum pickup under a microscope to evaluate pregnancy test with HCG beta titration blood test and examination of pregnancy and pregnancy sac at 12 weeks with ultrasound.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method othing. Timepoint: Nothing. Method of measurement: Nothing.