Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02638272
NCT02638272CompletedNot Applicable

Outcomes of Radical Debridement Versus no Debridement Under Different Surgical Procedures for the Treatment of Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University0 sites74 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
74
Primary Endpoint
blood loss in milliliter

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Whether radical debridement is necessary for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis is still questionable. The objective of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes of radical debridement versus no debridement under different surgical procedures for the treatment of thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.

Detailed Description

Seventy-four thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis patients with a neurological function of grade D and E underwent surgeries from January 2009 to January 2014. All patients were divided into group A and group B by taking the drawing of lots. In group A, radical debridement, bone graft and instrumentation were performed. In group B, isolated posterior instrumentation without debridement were performed in all cases and drainage of iliopsoas abscess via laparoscopy in 2 cases. The operative time, blood loss, visual analogue score (VAS), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), kyphotic angle, Frankel grading, fusion rate and complications were evaluated.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
14 Years to 67 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Frankel grading was grade D and E
  • Severe back pain
  • Abscess combined with high pressure symptoms
  • Larger sequestrum formation or sinus
  • Significant spinal instability.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Frankel grading was grade A,B and C
  • Conservative treatment

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

blood loss in milliliter

Time Frame: 5 years

The operative time in minutes

Time Frame: 5 years

erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in mm/h

Time Frame: 5 years

kyphotic angle in degree

Time Frame: 5 years

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Qian Jun

Principal Investigator

The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University

Similar Trials