A study to measure and compare the implant fixation to bone and mass of the bone of implants placed with two different techniques reverse rotation and osseodensification drilling technique in implants placed in upper arch
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K084- Partial loss of teeth
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/08/071893
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Vishva Vachhani
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
a Subjects more then or equal to 18 years
b Patient who needs minimum of 2 implants in the maxillary arch
c If completely edentulous patients needs fixed implant prosthesis
d Both the implants site nearly of the same density
e Able to provide consent
a Patients with medical history in which any dental intervention would be
contraindicated
b Patients with known allergy to dental implant material (Titanium)
c Patients in which sinus lift procedures should be carried out for the implant
placement
d Patients in which bone graft is needed at the implant placement site
e Patient who is current smoker or quieted smoking less then 1 year
f Patients undergoing radiotherapy cancer therapy or drug that interfere with the
study
g completely edentulous patients needed implant supported removable prosthesis
h Presence of systemic diseases producing oral manifestations
i Patients suffering from any bone related systemic diseases
j Patients with any local or systemic disease, condition or medication that might
compromise health of the periodontium
k Pregnant and lactating women
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method implant stability <br/ ><br>bone densityTimepoint: implant stability at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months after implant placement <br/ ><br>bone density at baseline and after 6 months of implant placement
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method ILTimepoint: NI