Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01022749
NCT01022749CompletedPhase 3

Prospective, Multicentre, Open-label Study Evaluating the Immunogenicity and Safety of Influenza Vaccine in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Receiving or Not Immunosuppressive Therapy

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris1 site in 1 country228 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2009Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
228
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Seroconversion rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of influenza vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving immunosuppressive therapy with patients not receiving immunosuppressants .

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the humoral immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in patients with IBD

Detailed Description

Annual vaccination against influenza is recommended for those at high risk of complications, particularly among patients with immunodeficiency including those resulting from immunosuppressive treatments administered for a chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, published data showing that influenza vaccination coverage is low in this population (<30%) due to lack of data on the effectiveness of vaccination in these patients and the theoretical risk of negative impact on the evolution of IBD.

To improve influenza vaccination coverage of the population treated by immunosuppressants for a chronic IBD, it is essential to have data on the effectiveness of vaccination in these populations.

The research aims to evaluate the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in patients followed for a chronic IBD.

Factors in choice of study population were as follows:

  1. IBD is a common disease. Among the inflammatory diseases treated with immunosuppressants and reaching patients under 65 years, IBD are among the most frequent. They result from an abnormal immune response to gut flora and their management often requires the prescription of immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, methotrexate, in particular) and more recently TNF-blockers;
  2. the existence of vaccine recommendations published recently for specific patients on immunosuppressive therapy at greatest risk of complications related to influenza;
  3. the fact that vaccinations have not been implicated in the pathogenesis of the disease;
  4. data showing that vaccination recommendations are poorly followed in this population. A recently published work found vaccination coverage against influenza of only 28% in a cohort of 169 patients treated for IBD;

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Non Randomized
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 64 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

2

Experimental

patients with IBD receiving immunosuppressants (TNF blockers excluded) (n=100)

Intervention: Vaccine (Drug)

3

Experimental

patients with IBD receiving immunosuppressants including TNF blockers (n=100)

Intervention: Vaccine (Drug)

1

Experimental

patients with IBD not receiving immunosuppressant (n=100)

Intervention: Vaccine (Drug)

4

Active Comparator

patients with IBD receiving immunosuppressants including TNF blockers (n=20)

Intervention: Vaccine anti-H1N1 (Biological)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Seroconversion rate

Time Frame: 3-4 weeks after vaccination

Seroconversion rate in the overall population, defined as the geometric mean titers ratio post / pre-vaccination for each of the three vaccine strains

Secondary Outcomes

  • Seroconversion factor(3 weeks and 6 months after vaccination)
  • Seroprotection rate against the three vaccine strains(3 or 4 weeks after of vaccination)
  • Seroprotection rate in the general population(3 weeks and 6 months after vaccination)
  • Seroconversion rate, geometric mean titers ratio before and after vaccination by haemagglutination inhibition assay(after 3 weeks of vaccination)
  • Comparison of seroprotection rates for each of the three vaccine strains obtained in each of three groups(3 weeks and 6 months of vaccination)
  • Comparison of seroconversion factors obtained after 1 or 2 vaccinations in each of three groups of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and in the entire population(After 3 weeks of vaccination)
  • Number of influenza episodes and confirmed flu during each influenza peak season(6 months after vaccination)
  • Occurrence of medical visits, emergency room visits, hospital admissions and deaths throughout the course of the study(18 months after vaccination)
  • Occurrence and intensity of local and general adverse events within 5 days after vaccine administration(5 days after vaccination)
  • Search of the determining factors to the influenza vaccine response(18 months after vaccination)
  • Sub-immunological study(6 months after vaccination)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials