The Accuracy of Reconstruction of Orbital Walls Fracture Using Prebent Mesh Versus Patient Specific Implant
- Conditions
- Orbital Fractures
- Interventions
- Device: reconstruction of orbital walls
- Registration Number
- NCT06294535
- Lead Sponsor
- Tanta University
- Brief Summary
under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. Then insertion of prebent titanium mesh or customized titanium implant and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.
- Detailed Description
under GA, incision to access to orbital walls. complete reflection of orbital floor to be constructed then insertion of customized orbital implant of patient or insertion of titanium mrsh after adaption on the model and fixation with miniscrews, examination of ocular motility using forced duction test followed by closure of flap.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- patient had fractured orbital walls suffering from enophthalmous, hypoglobus, diplopia
- systemic disease interfere with bone healing enophthamous less than 2 mm
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description prebent titanium mesh reconstruction of orbital walls reconstruction of fractured orbital walls with perbent titanium mesh customized titanium implant (patient specific implant) reconstruction of orbital walls econstruction of fractured orbital walls with patient specific implant (customized titanium implant)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method motility of eye one month using 9 gaze test to evaluate motility of eye
restoring the accurate position of eye one month- six months using exophthalmometer to measure enophthalmous
volume of orbit one to six months using CT scan to measure orbital volume pre and postoperative
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
🇪🇬Tanta, Egypt