comparison between motor dual task training and cognitive dual task training on balance in children with cerebral palsy
- Conditions
- Specific developmental disorder ofmotor function,
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/03/050826
- Lead Sponsor
- NA
- Brief Summary
The aim of this research is to find the effectivenessof motor dual task training and cognitive dual task training in children withcerebral palsy to improve balance in children and reduce their incidence offall.
Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group ofdisorders that affect a person’s ability to move and maintain balance andposture. CP is the most common motor disability in childhood. CP is caused byabnormal brain development or damage to the developing brain that affects aperson’s ability to control his or her muscles.
The prevalence of CP has risen towell above 2.0 per 1000 live births. In this time span the proportion oflow-birthweight infants rose, the proportion of diplegia decreased, while theproportion of hemiplegia increased. CP is more prevalent in more deprivedsocio-economic populations. The majority of people with CP have the spasticsyndrome of which the diplegic group is the smallest. Dependent on the subgroupof CP, 25 – 80% have additional impairments.
According to Karolina et al (2020)patient receiving dual task training have improved balance and functionalmobility children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy have improvedsignificantly in the course of 3 weeks.
Inclusion criteria includeStanding independently for at least 30 seconds. Walking independently with or without an assistive device Understandprotocol and parents give informed consent. Gross motor functional measure Iand II.
Exclusioncriteria includeChildren, who are uncooperativeHave history of epilepsy withhearing, visual and speech deficit Any cardiac anomalies affecting exercisetolerance.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Not Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
- 1.Stand independently for at least 30 seconds.
- 2.Walk independently with or without an assistive device 3.Understand protocol and parents give informed consent.
- 4.Gross motor functional measure I and II.
1.Children, who are uncooperative 2.Have history of epilepsy 3.With hearing, visual and speech deficit 4.Any cardiac anomalies affecting exercise tolerance.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method gross motor function measure 4 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method functional reach test 4 weeks peadiatric balance scale 4 weeks
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Indian Spinal Injury Center
🇮🇳Delhi, DELHI, India
Indian Spinal Injury Center🇮🇳Delhi, DELHI, IndiadevanPrincipal investigator8383936478devankashyap98@gmail.com