Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06355947
NCT06355947
Completed
Not Applicable

Cycling Induced Motor Cortex Plasticity and Functional Improvement -the Dual Task Evaluation Model for Parkinson Disease

Chang Gung University1 site in 1 country50 target enrollmentDecember 7, 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Parkinson Disease(PD)
Sponsor
Chang Gung University
Enrollment
50
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Task Accuracy
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Motor impairment in lower extremities is common in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Development sensitive test for early motor deviations is important. Conventional walking test cannot induce the PD related motor impairments, such as freezing of gait. Therefore, finding a safe substitute test to induce PD related motor impairments is important.

Studies showed that working memory related dual task walking was a sensitive test for PD. However, the optimal cognitive test needs to be clarified. Studies also showed that the neuromuscular control mechanism of leg movements during cycling were similar to those during walking. Therefore, dual task cycling test is potential to be a safe and sensitive testing model.

Studies showed that exercise could improve cognitive function and induce brain plasticity. Dual task exercise training was shown to be more effective than single task exercise training for older people to prevent fall. Whether the added cognitive task could improve to detriment brain plasticity in PD should be investigated. Transcranial magnetic stimulation can evaluate the motor cortex plasticity on-invasively and can evaluate the exercise induced brain plasticity.

The purpose of this three-year project is to develop PD-sensitive. The purposes of the first year are to translate the dual task walking test to dual task cycling test, and to establish the reliability of the dual task cycling test.

The purposes of the second year are to compare the motor cortex plasticity induced by single task cycling versus dual task cycling and to compare the difference response between PD and healthy control people.

The purpose of the third year is to evaluate the effect of 8 week long term cycling training or treadmill training of individuals with PD on motor cortex plasticity, dual task performance, and ambulation ability.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 7, 2015
End Date
July 31, 2018
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ya-Ju Chang

Professor

Chang Gung University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Musculoskeletal injuries on legs
  • Osteoporosis.
  • Any peripheral or central nervous system injury or disease patients.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Task Accuracy

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.

The percentage of correct responses or actions made by participants in response to walking or cycling tasks.

Reaction Time

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.

The duration between the onset of task start time and the participant's response to it, typically expressed in second (s).

Balance Performance

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

Measured by the duration the stance can be maintained, typically expressed second.

Step Length

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

The linear distance between the two ankles, typically expressed in centimeters(cm).

Power Spectral Density (PSD)

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks.

Quantifies the power of EEG signals within specific frequency bands (e.g., delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) over a period.

Walking Speed

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

The time taken by participants to walk a standardized distance, typically expressed in centimeters per second (cm/s).

Step Time

Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks

The duration taken for one complete step, measuring from foot-off of one foot to the next foot-off of the same foot, usually expressed in seconds.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Swing Time(Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks)
  • Single Support Time(Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks)
  • Heart rate(Baseline)
  • Stance Time(Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks)
  • Double Support Time(Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks)
  • Cadence(Baseline, 4 weeks and 8 weeks)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials