Effect of a Machine Learning Ventilator Decision System Versus Standard Controlled Ventilation on in Critical Care: a Randomized Trial
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 300
- Primary Endpoint
- Mechanical ventilation time
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Ventilator-induced lung injury is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Despite intense efforts in basic and clinical research, an individualized ventilation strategy for critically ill patients remains a major challenge. However, an individualized mechanical ventilation approach remains a challenging task: A multitude of factors, e.g., lab values, vitals, comorbidities, disease progression, and other clinical data must be taken into consideration when choosing a patient's specific optimal ventilation regime. The aim of this work was to evaluate the machine learning ventilator decision system, which is able to suggest a dynamically optimized mechanical ventilation regime for critically-ill patients. Compare with standard controlled ventilation, to test whether the clinical application of the machine learning ventilator decision system reduces mechanical ventilation time and mortality.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •only the first ICU stay was eligible;
- •adults ≥ 18 years of age on ICU admission;
- •estimate mechanical ventilation time ≥24 hours;
Exclusion Criteria
- Not provided
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Mechanical ventilation time
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 days
Secondary Outcomes
- Length of ICU stay time(through study completion, an average of 1 week)
- Length of hospital stay(through study completion, an average of 2 weeks)
- In-hospital mortality(through study completion, an average of 2 weeks)
Investigators
Hu Anmin
The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University
The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University
