Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04452903
NCT04452903
Completed
N/A

A Communication Enhancing Intervention to Improve Patients' Perception of Physiotherapy Consultations: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ariel University1 site in 1 country558 target enrollmentJuly 1, 2020
ConditionsCommunication

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Communication
Sponsor
Ariel University
Enrollment
558
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Consultation reassurance questionnaire (0-72). Change is being assess before and after the intervention.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of a single training session in communication skills at improving patients' perceptions of physiotherapy consultations.

Detailed Description

Population: Physiotherapists Detail: Physiotherapists (n=30) who work at 'Clalit' institute's (public health management organization in Israel) at four physiotherapy clinics. Intervention: A single session of training in consultation-based communication skills Detail: a 3-hour communication skill workshop, followed by a month-long period to assimilate and implement the new set of skills, with supervision available by phone from the trainers. Comparison: No training Detail: The control group receives no extra training. Outcome: New patients' perception of consultations Detail: The Primary Outcome Measure is the Consultation-Based Reassurance Questionnaire (CRQ) The CRQ measures patients' perceptions of consultation. It consists of four subscales, each with three items: data-gathering, relationship-building, generic reassurance, and cognitive reassurance. The investigators are assessing change between two-time points (before and after the intervention). And also, the difference between study groups. This is collected twice: at baseline, and at follow up, from the intervention and control groups. Type of Question: therapy Detail: The study tests whether a single training sessions can improve communication in consultations with physiotherapists. Type of Study: RCT Detail: Stage 1: Pre-randomization: The physiotherapists (n=30) will hand out a Consultation-Based Reassurance Questionnaire (CRQ) in a sealed envelope to each eligible patient (age 18+) they receive for the first consultation in two weeks period. The patient will complete the questionnaire in private, post consultation, and place it in a closed box. The physiotherapist will recruit a minimum of five patients each (n\>150). Baseline measures are: age, gender, pain area, chronicity, pain severity, disability, satisfaction from the consultation and the Consultation-Based Reassurance Questionnaire. Stage 2: Randomization: The process for randomization: First, participating physiotherapists will be matched for gender, seniority, and quality of reassurance in every clinic. They will then be allocated into one of the two arms at random (1:1), according to a computer random number list. Stage 3: Follow up: After the intervention, both the intervention and control groups will again hand out the questionnaires (age, gender, pain area, chronicity, pain severity, disability, satisfaction from the consultation and the CRQ) to new eligible patients that arrive for the first consultation. The physiotherapist will recruit a minimum of ten patients each (total sample therefore n\> 300, minimum number per arm=150). sample size The sample size was calculated with G\*Power 3.1.9.4 using the t-test family to detect the difference between two independent means (two groups). The input parameters were as follows: for a two-tailed test, assuming a medium effect size of 0.5, α=0.05, and β=0.95, the total sample size recommended was 210 participants. One hundred five participants in each study group (intervention and control).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 1, 2020
End Date
December 20, 2020
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Physiotherapists:
  • Working for Clalit Health Services. Dan-Petach Tikva region
  • Willing to participate in a 3-hour communication skills workshop
  • Patients:
  • over the age of 18
  • literate in Hebrew
  • Willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unwilling to participate in the trial
  • Illiterate in Hebrew

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Consultation reassurance questionnaire (0-72). Change is being assess before and after the intervention.

Time Frame: measure assessing change between two time points: base line and at two month.

A questionnaire that measures patients' perceptions of consultation- higher values represent a better communication skills

Secondary Outcomes

  • The numeric pain rating scale (0-10)(2 month)
  • Disability (0-10)(2 month)
  • Satisfaction (0-10)(2 month)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Recruiting
N/A
Study of a Communication Training Intervention for Large B-Cell Lymphoma ProvidersLymphoma, B-CellLymphomaLarge-cell LymphomaLarge B-cell LymphomaDLBCL - Diffuse Large B Cell LymphomaMediastinal B-Cell Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma
NCT05940272Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center48
Completed
N/A
Determining the Benefits of Improving Communication in BPAP/CPAP UsersPositive-Pressure RespirationCommunication
NCT03795753Emory University36
Completed
N/A
Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (The Four Supports Study)Physician-Family Communication in Intensive Care UnitsSurrogate Decision-making for Critically Ill Patients
NCT01107704University of Pittsburgh159
Completed
N/A
An Educational Intervention to Improve Resident Comfort With Communication at the End of LifeEnd of Life Communication
NCT01150968University of California, San Francisco166
Completed
N/A
Professional physician-claimant communication during work disability assessments.physician-patient communicationwork disability from a medical perspectivearts-patiëntcommunicatiearbeidsongeschiktheidsbeoordeling
NL-OMON25462- Primair: VU University Medical Center, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, department of Public and Occupational Health; Research Centre for Insurance Medicine/Kenniscentrum Verzekeringsgeneeskunde van AMC-UMCG-UWV-VUmc (KCVG).- Secundair: Dutch Institute of Employee Benefit Schemes (UWV), Department ‘Sociaal Medische Zaken’ and Department ‘Centraal Expertise Centrum/Opleidingen AG’; TNO Quality of Life, Hoofddorp.40