Comparison of two different types of second generation LMAs in ear surgeries under TIVA
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: H60-H95- Diseases of the ear and mastoid process
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/07/034527
- Lead Sponsor
- Sharda hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. ASA grade 1 & 2
2. Age 18-45 years
3. Patients scheduled for elective ear surgery with either I-gel or PLMA as airway device
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with respiratory tract infection
2. Difficult airway (mouth opening <2cm, Mallampati class 4, limited neck extension, history of previous difficult intubation)
3. Known pulmonary and cardiovascular diseases
4. Risk of aspiration (full stomach, hiatus hernia, GERD)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare ease of insertion and time taken for insertion of I gel v/s Proseal LMA.Timepoint: 5 minutes
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method a)To record the hemodynamic changes. <br/ ><br>b)To check for postoperative sore throat <br/ ><br>c)To check for postoperative nausea and vomiting. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1 minute before induction (baseline), just before LMA insertion, 5 minute after LMA insertion and 10 minute after LMA insertion <br/ ><br> Patients will be observed for 1 hour after extubation in post- operative care unit.