跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00259350
NCT00259350已完成4 期

Prevention of Central Venous Catheter Infections : Comparison of the Efficacy of Skin Disinfection With 5% Povidone Iodine in Alcoholic Solution Versus 0.25% Chlorhexidine, 0.025 Benzalkonium and 4% Benzylic Alcohol

Poitiers University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 520 人开始时间: 2004年5月最近更新:
适应症
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
520
试验地点
2
主要终点
Prevention of catheter colonization

研究概览

简要总结

The best antiseptic solution for cateheter care remains unknown.High concentration in aquous solution or low concentration in alcoholic solution of chlorhexidine actbetter than povidone iodine in aquous solutions. No study has compare alcoholic formulations of low concentration of chlorhexidine and povidone iodine for skin disinfection prior to insertion of central venous catheters.

To compare the incidence of central venous catheter colonization after skin disinfection with either an alcoholic solution of povidone iodine or a combination of 0.5% chlorhexidine, 0.025% Benzalkonium and 4% benzylic alcohol.

To compare the incidence of catheter related bacteremia in the to study groups. To compare the local and general tolerance of the two antiseptic formulations

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients over 18 yeras of age
  • Requiring an internal jugular or sub-clavian central venous catheter for their care during at least 72 h
  • Informed consent signed up

排除标准

  • Bacteriemic infection not under control
  • extensive cutaneous infection
  • Women with childbearing potential

结局指标

主要结局

Prevention of catheter colonization

次要结局

  • Local and general tolerance
  • Prevention of catheter related bacteremia
  • Prevention of a positive culture of the catheter whaterver the threshold

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验