Comparison of Proton or Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy After Surgery for Endometrial or Cervical Cancer

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Cervical Carcinoma; Endometriosis; Endometrial Carcinoma; Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
• Interventions: Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration; Radiation: Radiation Therapy

• Registration Number: NCT04567771
• Lead Sponsor: Mayo Clinic

Brief Summary

This early phase I trial compares the side effects between patients treated with proton radiation therapy versus intensity modulated radiation therapy after surgery for the treatment of endometrial or cervical cancer. Radiation therapy uses high energy protons or x-rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Using quality of life questionnaires and adverse event assessments may help doctors learn whether proton radiation therapy is associated with lower acute gastrointestinal toxicities at the end of treatment compared to intensity modulated radiation therapy in patients with endometrial or cervical cancer.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. To assess whether proton radiation therapy (RT) is associated with lower acute gastrointestinal toxicities at the end of treatment compared to intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) as measured with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel domain.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To examine the association of bowel and bladder dose-volume histogram (DVH) with bowel and bladder toxicities, respectively.

II. To assess whether urinary toxicity rate is improved with proton RT compared to IMRT as measured with the EPIC urinary domain.

III. To determine if well-being is improved with proton RT compared to IMRT as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) cervix domain.

IV. To determine if proton RT reduces grade 2+ hematologic toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[CTCAE\] version \[v\] 4.0) compared to IMRT.

V. Evaluate progression-free and overall survival between patients receiving proton RT and IMRT.

VI. To determine if proton RT improves overall patient quality of life compared to IMRT using the European Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire.

EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate ability to tolerate chemotherapy concurrent or after RT. II. Correlate bone marrow DVH with blood marrow function, and ability to tolerate chemotherapy concurrently or after RT.

III. Correlate bowel and skin DVH with acute toxicity. IV. To evaluate patient-reported gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities as a predictor of assigned treatment regimen, as well as physician-reported GI toxicities as a predictor of assigned treatment regimen.

V. Confirm the validity of the EPIC bowel and urinary domains when referencing the last 7 days.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo standard of care proton or intensity modulated radiation therapy. Patients also complete quality of life questionnaires and adverse event assessments over 10-15 minutes each at baseline, at the end of radiation therapy, and at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years post-radiation therapy.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2020-09-23
• Study First Submitted QC: 2020-09-23
• Study First Posted: 2020-09-28
• Study Start: 2020-12-04
• Status Verified: 2024-11
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-11-12
• Last Update Posted: 2024-11-13
• Primary Completion: 2025-10-15
• Study Completion: 2025-10-15

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: Female
• Target Recruitment: 120

Inclusion Criteria

• Histologically confirmed diagnosis of cervical or endometrial cancer

• Must have undergone an open or robotic hysterectomy (total abdominal, vaginal, radical, or total laparoscopic) for carcinoma of the cervix or endometrium

• History and physical prior to registration

• Documentation of history of:

  • Smoking status
  • Pelvic infection
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Endometriosis

• Planned to receive either proton or IMRT radiation treatment, with use of rectal balloon, at an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved Mayo Clinic site

• Plan for RT to pelvis with or without para-aortic lymph node irradiation

• If received high-dose chemotherapy prior to registration, last dose must have been given >= 21 days prior to start of RT

• Complete blood count (CBC) performed within 21 days prior to registration

• Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, or PET/MRI for staging before registration; may be pre-operative (op) or post-op

• Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2

• Provide written informed consent

• Willing to complete quality of life (QOL) questionnaires

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Receiving external beam boost dose during RT

• Distant metastases

• Gross disease at time of RT

• Histology of endometrial stromal sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, melanoma or small cell carcinomas

• Patients who exceed the weight/size limits of the treatment table

• Positive or close surgical margins (=< 3 mm)

• Prior RT to the pelvis

• Planned to receive inguinal node RT

• Hepatic insufficiency resulting in clinical jaundice and/or coagulation defects

• Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) based upon current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition; note that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing is not required for entry into this protocol. The need to exclude patients with AIDS from this protocol is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may be immunosuppressive.

• Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years

• Severe, active co-morbidity defined as follows:

  • Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months
  • Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months
  • Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration

• Other major medical illness which requires hospitalization or precludes study therapy at the time of registration

• Patients unwilling to have rectal balloon placed on a daily basis during RT

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Treatment (radiation therapy, questionnaires)	Quality-of-Life Assessment	Patients undergo standard of care proton or intensity modulated radiation therapy. Patients also complete quality of life questionnaires and adverse event assessments over 10-15 minutes each at baseline, at the end of radiation therapy, and at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years post-radiation therapy.
Treatment (radiation therapy, questionnaires)	Questionnaire Administration	Patients undergo standard of care proton or intensity modulated radiation therapy. Patients also complete quality of life questionnaires and adverse event assessments over 10-15 minutes each at baseline, at the end of radiation therapy, and at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years post-radiation therapy.
Treatment (radiation therapy, questionnaires)	Radiation Therapy	Patients undergo standard of care proton or intensity modulated radiation therapy. Patients also complete quality of life questionnaires and adverse event assessments over 10-15 minutes each at baseline, at the end of radiation therapy, and at 1 month, 1 year, and 3 years post-radiation therapy.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel score	Baseline up to 3 years post-radiation therapy (RT)	Will be examined using analysis of covariance.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Bowel and bladder dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters	Up to 3 years post-RT	Will be examined in association with the change in EPIC Bowel and Urinary scores using analysis of covariance, considering the DVH variables as model covariates.
Change in EPIC Urinary score	Baseline up to 5 weeks	Will be examined using analysis of covariance.
Incidence of grade 2+ hematologic toxicities	Up to 3 years post-RT	Measured by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Will be examined using logistic regression.
Progression-free survival	Up to 3 years post-RT	Will be examined using survival methods. Cumulative probability of progression rates will be calculated treating death as a competing risk. Cox models will be used to assess the association of treatment received (proton RT versus intensity modulated radiation therapy \[IMRT\]).
Well-being	Up to 3 years post-RT	Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy cervix domain. Will be examined using analysis of covariance.
Change in overall patient quality of life	Baseline up to 3 years post-RT	Measured by the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire. Will be examined using analysis of covariance.
Overall survival (OS)	Up to 3 years post-RT	Will be examined using survival methods. Estimates of OS will be calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Cox models will be used to assess the association of treatment received (proton RT versus IMRT).

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Mayo Clinic in Arizona; 🇺🇸 Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Mayo Clinic in Florida; 🇺🇸 Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Mayo Clinic in Rochester; 🇺🇸 Rochester, Minnesota, United States