Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses - a Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 428
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Team leadership
研究概览
简要总结
Several approaches for summative assessment during Advanced Life Support courses are used. The most commonly used method during European Resuscitation (ERC) Council Life Support Courses is that 1 instructor is miming a whole team, and the candidate has to lead this "team" through a scenario; another variant of the summative assessment (mainly used by American Heart Association (AHA) Courses) is with a group of students, where one student is the team leader to be assessed and the others are his team not being assessed. The second approach might be more realistic; however there is no evidence around with regard to effectiveness (pass/fail rate, ability to test non-technical skills (NTS)) or participant/assessor satisfaction.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •All medical students at the University of Bern, study year 2017/2018, 5th and 6th study year
排除标准
- •Refusal to participate
研究组 & 干预措施
ERC
Assessment as used by the European Resuscitation Council
干预措施: assessment (Other)
AHA
Assessment as used by the American Heart Association
干预措施: assessment (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Team leadership
时间窗: 1 minute after the assessment is completed
Subjective rating of team leadership
次要结局
未报告次要终点
