跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03412032
NCT03412032已完成不适用

Comparison of Two Summative Assessment Methods in Advanced Life Support Courses - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 428 人开始时间: 2017年12月2日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
428
试验地点
1
主要终点
Team leadership

研究概览

简要总结

Several approaches for summative assessment during Advanced Life Support courses are used. The most commonly used method during European Resuscitation (ERC) Council Life Support Courses is that 1 instructor is miming a whole team, and the candidate has to lead this "team" through a scenario; another variant of the summative assessment (mainly used by American Heart Association (AHA) Courses) is with a group of students, where one student is the team leader to be assessed and the others are his team not being assessed. The second approach might be more realistic; however there is no evidence around with regard to effectiveness (pass/fail rate, ability to test non-technical skills (NTS)) or participant/assessor satisfaction.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •All medical students at the University of Bern, study year 2017/2018, 5th and 6th study year

排除标准

  • •Refusal to participate

研究组 & 干预措施

ERC

Other

Assessment as used by the European Resuscitation Council

干预措施: assessment (Other)

AHA

Other

Assessment as used by the American Heart Association

干预措施: assessment (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Team leadership

时间窗: 1 minute after the assessment is completed

Subjective rating of team leadership

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验