Zio Real-World Evaluation
- Conditions
- CardiologyStroke/TIA
- Interventions
- Other: Zio XT service
- Registration Number
- NCT05560828
- Lead Sponsor
- King's College London
- Brief Summary
In 2020 an independent evaluation of the Zio service as part of the Digital Health Technologies programme at NICE was conducted. From the available clinical and economic evidence, the evaluation concluded that further evidence is needed to estimate the resource use associated with Zio compared with standard care, particularly the number of outpatient visits and repeat testing needed. Additionally it recommended further evidence is needed for the longer-term clinical consequences such as anticoagulant uptake and other changes to treatment related to the results from monitoring. (MTG52) Therefore, this study aims to address these uncertainties and identify whether the Zio service could be used in the health and social care system in England. This will be assessed using a multicentre, cohort study design consisting of two cohorts. The data for the existing standard of care cohort using Holter monitor (cohort 1) will be collected from 6-month retrospective pre-covid data, and, for the Zio service cohort (cohort 2), data will be collected retrospectively over a 6-month period. Each cohort will include two separate populations recruited from cardiology clinics and stroke/TIA clinics. The main objective of this study is to analyse quantitative data collected from participating sites and complementary qualitative data on Zio utilisation from questionnaires
- Detailed Description
The proposed study is a multi-centre, cohort study that will collect 6-month control data from a cohort of participants wearing Holter devices (2018-2019) and match this data to a 6-month cohort of patients wearing Zio patches (2021 - 2022). An additional cohort of patients using the Zio patch from both the cardiology and stroke/TIA population will be included for the patient experience aspect of the study.
Other designs have been considered but from a pragmatic point of view and the need for a "real-world" evaluation this is the preferred alternative with the caveat that there may not be an exact match between the two patient groups.
The proposed study is a multi-centre, cohort study that will collect 6-month baseline data from a retrospective cohort of participants wearing Holter devices and match this data to a 6-month retrospective cohort of patients wearing Zio patches. Zio is standard of care at the NHS sites participating in this study, but it is not standard of care across the NHS. The standard of care received by patients involved in this study will not be affected by their participation in the study. However, should Zio be adopted more widely by the NHS, a change in pathway will be required. The Zio device is CE marked as a Class IIa and will be used within its intended purpose.
Two separate populations will be considered for this study: cardiology outpatients and patients at risk of (or who have had a previous) stroke or TIA. Each of these populations will comprise a control cohort for Holter monitor and a cohort for Zio service, which will be analysed separately. A separate cohort comprising of participants prescribed Zio will be included in a qualitative analysis to assess their experience of using Zio and previous experience of using Holter monitor within the past 2 years, where applicable. This will allow for a comparative analysis of patient experience. For patients in the cohort who have not had prior experience of using Holter monitor, a questionnaire will be administered to assess their experience of using Zio only.
Given the potential for a shift in the spectrum of the population that may be expected when Zio is implemented, propensity score matching will be utilised to compare the Holter and Zio cohorts for both the stroke/TIA and cardiology arms.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1440
Data from stroke/TIA population:
- 18 years of age or older
- diagnosed with having had an ischaemic non-lacunar stroke or probable TIA by a stroke clinician or neurologist.
- Referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring
Data from cardiology population:
- 18 years of age or older
- experiencing symptomatic palpitations, dizziness, pre-syncope or syncope
- Referred for ambulatory ECG monitoring
Qualitative data will be collected via self-administered questionnaires from healthcare professionals who:
• are involved in prescribing the Zio XT service, fitting the Zio patch, interpreting the Zio report and making a treatment decision.
Qualitative data will be collected via self-administered questionnaires from patients who:
- are 18 years of age or older
- have been prescribed the Zio patch
- have been prescribed the Zio patch and the Holter monitor (within two years)
Data from stroke/TIA population:
- History of AF or atrial flutter
- > 50% stenosis of a potentially symptomatic cervical artery (carotid or vertebral)
- Pre-existing indication or contraindication for permanent anticoagulation therapy
- Significant uncertainty of TIA diagnosis such as cases where TIA treatment isn't initiated
- New lacunar stroke reported on imaging which corresponds to the presenting stroke syndrome
Data from cardiology population:
-
Patients in whom 24-hour monitoring is required due to the following reasons:
- experiencing daily symptoms
- the need for AF rate control measurement
- the need for ectopic burden measurement
-
Patients who are prescribed Implantable Loop Recorders and pacemakers in situ
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Zio Cohort Zio XT service Patients who have been prescribed Zio
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to diagnosis 6 months Time to diagnosis
Time to treatment decision 6 months Time to treatment decision - referral for anticoagulant prescription or other clinical intervention, where needed
Time to device being fitted 6 months Time to device being fitted
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time to ECG report 6 months Time to ECG report
Resource utilisation 6 months Resource utilisation
Time to repeat ambulatory ECG test referrals 6 months Time to repeat ambulatory ECG test referrals
Number of hospital visits 6 months Number of hospital visits
Diagnostic yield 6 months Diagnostic yield
Time to discharge of patients with non-clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia 6 months Time to discharge of patients with non-clinically significant cardiac arrhythmia
Number of insertable cardiac monitors such as LINQ implants 6 months Number of insertable cardiac monitors such as LINQ implants
Number of inconclusive follow-up appointments 6 months Number of inconclusive follow-up appointments
Number of device failures / adverse events 6 months Number of device failures / adverse events
Proportion of patients that undergo full monitoring following referral 6 months Proportion of patients that undergo full monitoring following referral
Settlement of patient's GP surgery - urban or rural area 6 months Settlement of patient's GP surgery - urban or rural area
"Rule out" 6 months "Rule out" - number of patients with non-clinically significant arrhythmia
Patient experience 6 months Patient experience of using Zio
Clinical experience of using Zio 6 months Clinical experience of using Zio